Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management

By S. Gaines, Crow White, M. Carr, Stephen R. Palumbi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010

844 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a0dd8fd0c6f8f0ae0a66908e4dd17343c53c231

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. S. R. Floeter
2. Wilfried Thuiller
3. C. E. Ferreira
4. Nancy Knowlton
5. David Mouillot
6. J. Emmett Duffy
7. Peter J. S. Jones
8. Fiorenza Micheli

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. R. Floeter
2. C. E. Ferreira
3. Peter J. S. Jones
4. Nancy Knowlton
5. Stelios Katsanevakis
6. J. Joyeux
7. J. Emmett Duffy
8. S. Gaines

In Oceanography

1. S. R. Floeter
2. J. Emmett Duffy
3. C. E. Ferreira
4. Fiorenza Micheli
5. Peter J. S. Jones
6. Hilmar Hinz
7. Nancy Knowlton
8. William J. Sydeman

Citations in the corpus

• Securing ocean benefits for society in the face of climate change (2013, background): “, often where local stressors are minimized and habitat heterogeneity and connectivity among marine habitats is maintained), coastal systems will be better equipped to respond to climate-related changes in storms, freshwater runoff, fishing pressures, and other potential stressors [2,75–79].”
• Spatial scales of marine conservation management for breeding seabirds (2018, background): “Some of the widely dispersing species use areas at sea that may be considered too large for the establishment and enforcement of strict marine reserves that ban all economic activity that negatively affect birds and other biodiversity [4,19,20].”
• Industrial fishing, no-take zones and endangered penguins (2012, neutral): “Networks of protected areas also show promise in protecting species with large ranges (Roberts et al., 2001; Gaines et al., 2010; Hooker et al., 2011).”
• Linking temperate demersal fish species to habitat: scales, patterns and future directions (2013, background): “…can vary widely, from fishing quota implementation (Karagiannakos 1996) or the establishment of no take zones (NTZ) and marine protected areas (MPA) (Gaines et al. 2010), to stock restoration projects involving artificial habitat construction (Seaman 2008) and re-stocking (Heenan et al. 2009).”
• Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: Review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues (2011, background): “…coherent MPA networks that enhance cumulative interactions and effectiveness of conservation over awider geographical scale has been recognized (Agardy, 2005; EC, 2008b; Fernandes et al., 2005; Gaines et al., 2010; IUCN-WCPA, 2008; Roberts, 1997; Roberts et al., 2003; Sala et al., 2002).”
• Additive effects of climate change on connectivity between marine protected areas and larval supply to fished areas (2015, background): “In addition to enhancing species persistence and biodiversity representation, in the case of exploited species, connectivity from PAs to unprotected areas can offer benefit for harvesting and economic human activities (Gaines et al., 2010; Tolon et al., 2012).”
• Effective Coverage Targets for Ocean Protection (2016, methodology): “Previous reviews in 2003 (N = 40 studies, Gell & Roberts 2003) and 2010 (N = 33 studies, Gaines et al. 2010) suggested that 20–40% coverage is warranted.”
• A blueprint for securing Brazil's marine biodiversity and supporting the achievement of global conservation goals (2020, background): “, 2016; Weeks, 2017), given that this ecological principle is a means by which to achieve biological persistence (Gaines et al., 2010; Magris, et al., 2018).”
• The Resilience of Marine Ecosystems to Climatic Disturbances (2017, background): “Protection of large, fecund individuals in MPAs can also maintain the reproductive and recruitment potential of populations depleted by climate-driven mass mortalities (Micheli et al.”
• The rise of large-scale marine protected areas: Conservation or geopolitics? (2013, background): “…(Grüss et al., 2011), limiting access to protect stocks and ecosystems in scale marine protected areas: Conservation or geopolitics?, Ocean & 08.013 remote international waters, resolving territorial conflicts, and promoting more sustainable harvests of trans-boundary stocks (Gaines et al., 2010a).”
• Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks (2013, background): “These networks of marine protected areas function as source-sink systems by sending individuals into exploited areas; this strategy significantly increases not only the fishery value (Costello et al., 2010; Gaines et al., 2010), but also environmental and tourism values (McCook et al.”