Landscape context affects trap‐nesting bees, wasps, and their natural enemies
By I. Steffan‐Dewenter. 2002
189 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cf38412380b35872b802c4c87460e2a45ed2320e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- T. Tscharntke
- C. Kremen
- N. Williams
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- S. Potts
- Henrik G. Smith
- R. Bommarco
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- T. Tscharntke
- C. Kremen
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- S. Potts
- N. Williams
- Josef Settele
- J. Macivor
In Plant Science
- T. Tscharntke
- C. Kremen
- Alexandra-Maria Klein
- N. Williams
- S. Potts
- I. Steffan‐Dewenter
- Henrik G. Smith
- R. Bommarco
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of Management Intensity and Season on Arboreal Ant Diversity and Abundance in Coffee Agroecosystems (2004, background): “patterns such as extent of high-quality habitat and habitat arrangement may also be important (Vandermeer and Carvajal 2001; Steffan-Dewenter 2002; Weibull et al. 2003).”
- Wild pollination services to California almond rely on semi‐natural habitat (2012, background): “…et al. 2008; Garibaldi et al. 2011) but can benefit from the amount of surrounding natural or semi-natural habitat (Kremen, Williams & Thorp 2002; Steffan-Dewenter 2002) or by organic management (Morandin &Winston 2005; Gabriel et al. 2010) and by the potential interaction between landscape and…”
- Foraging trip duration and density of megachilid bees, eumenid wasps and pompilid wasps in tropical agroforestry systems (2004, background): “Many insect communities are known to be influenced not only by the local habitat conditions, but also by the surrounding landscape matrix (Huston 1999; Ricketts 2001; Perfecto & Vandermeer 2002; Steffan-Dewenter 2002; Tscharntke et al. 2002).”
- Biodiversity in tropical agroforests and the ecological role of ants and ant diversity in predatory function (2006, background): “…of biodiversity similar to nearby native forests ( Moguel & Toledo, 1999 ), facilitate between-fragment dispersal ( Vandermeer & Carvajal, 2001; Steffan-Dewenter, 2002 ), and may maintain metapopulation dynamics and long-term survival of forest species ( Vandermeer & Carvajal, 2001; Perfecto &…”
- Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales (2007, background): “…of metres and several kilometres, and the scale at which this relationship is strongest should reflect the dispersal distance of the study organism (Steffan-Dewenter, 2002; Steffan-Dewenter et al., 2002; Westphal et al., 2003, 2006; Chust et al., 2004; Kremen et al., 2004; Thies et al., 2005).”
- Abundance and diversity of wild bees along gradients of heavy metal pollution (2012, background): “To evaluate the effects of heavy metal pollution on the diversity and abundance of bees, standardized nest sites for above-ground nesting bees (Tscharntke,Gathmann& Steffan-Dewenter 1998; Steffan-Dewenter 2002; Moroń et al. 2008; Westphal et al. 2008) were established in each site.”
- Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees (2008, background): “These landscape types differ in habitat heterogeneity (Rundlöf and Smith, 2006) and it has been shown that habitat heterogeneity is a key factor in maintaining biodiversity (Weibull et al., 2000; Steffan-Dewenter, 2002; Benton et al., 2003).”
- Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agroecosystems. A review (2012, unknown): “Often times, diverse farms with a variety of landscape features including patches of bare soil, piles, or hedgerows of stone and clump-forming grasses can provide ample nest habitat for wild bees (Steffan-Dewenter 2002).”
- Diversity patterns of wild bees and wasps in managed boreal forests: Effects of spatial structure, local habitat and surrounding landscape (2015, methodology): “The scale of highest correlation was used for each factor in all subsequent analyses (Steffan-Dewenter 2002; Martin and Fahrig 2012).”
- Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control (2006, background): “…than simplified, coarse-grained landscapes composed of mainly arable fields (Banaszak 1992; Tscharntke et al. 1998; Weibull et al. 2000; Söderström et al. 2001; Steffan-Dewenter 2002, 2003; Kruess 2003; Weibull & Östman 2003; Weibull et al. 2003; Purtauf et al. 2005a,b; Schmidt et al. 2005).”
- Are urban parks refuges for bumble bees Bombus spp. (Hymenoptera: Apidae)? (2006, unknown): “Proportion of surrounding seminatural habitats positively correlates with species richness of trap nesting bees, wasps and their natural enemies (Steffan-Dewenter, 2002) and solitary, wild bees at small spatial scales and honey bees at large spatial scales (Steffan-Dewenter et al., 2002), while…”
- Organic farming in isolated landscapes does not benefit flower-visiting insects and pollination (2010, background): “The landscape context has been found to modify the beneficial effects of organic systems on biodiversity (Bengtsson et al., 2005; Holzschuh et al., 2007; Rundlöf et al., 2008b; Steffan-Dewenter, 2002).”
- Effects of prescribed fire and fire surrogates on floral visiting insects of the blue ridge province in North Carolina (2007, background): “For food and nesting sites, many native bees depend on habitats resulting from extensive land use (Steffan-Dewenter, 2002), which suggests that forest management may benefit some native bee populations.”
- Landscape composition and configuration differently affect trap-nesting bees, wasps and their antagonists (2014, background): “different spatial scales depending on species-specific dispersal and foraging distances (Steffan-Dewenter, 2002).”
- Cavity-nest boxes for solitary bees: a century of design and research (2017, background): “The degree of manipulation and flexibility in studies using nest boxes allows for simple, low-cost and data-rich sampling to address questions in community ecology (Steffan-Dewenter 2002; Sheffield et al. 2008a; Westphal et al. 2008; Schüepp et al. 2011; Steckel et al. 2014).”