Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumble bees

By M. Rundlöf, H. Nilsson, Henrik G. Smith. 2008

278 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f48877f21b3404a2d7608cc703d14b6c467fa901

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Insect Science

Citations in the corpus

Herbivore and pollinator responses to grassland management intensity along experimental changes in plant species richness (2012, background): “Plant diversity and blossom cover are higher in organic fields compared to conventional fields due to lower amounts of fertilizer application and organic farms contain greater areas of semi-natural vegetation (Bengtsson et al., 2005; Gibson et al., 2007; Rundlöf et al., 2008).”
The same, but different: pollen foraging in honeybee and bumblebee colonies (2011, background): “2005), foraging range (Benton 2006), colony size (Rundlöf et al. 2008), climatic niche (Williams et al.”
The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations. (2011, background): “It may yield a positive statistical interaction with other indirect factors (98) or do so in a species-specific or habitat-specific manner (17, 59).”
Relationships between wild bees, hoverflies and pollination success in apple orchards with different landscape contexts (2016, background): “The interaction between landscape structure and crop management variables often drives the diversity and/or the abundance of wild pollinator communities (Holzschuh et al., 2007; Rundlöf et al., 2008; Batáry et al., 2011).”
Intensification of agriculture, landscape composition and wild bee communities: a large scale study in four European countries. (2010, background): “Recent studies mostly aim at comparing organic and conventional agriculture (Clough et al., 2007; Holzschuh et al., 2007, 2008; Kremen et al., 2002; Winfree et al., 2008, on the whole bee community; Ekroos et al., 2008; Rundlöf et al., 2008 on bumblebees).”
Set-aside management: How do succession, sowing patterns and landscape context affect biodiversity? (2011, background): “Also in Sweden, organic farming enhanced bumblebee richness and abundance only in simple landscapes (Rundlöf et al., 2008), and enhanced wild bee diversity can relate into enhanced crop pollination.”
Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators (2016, background): “…and removal of hedgerows for intensive agriculture decreases 387 overall wildflower diversity and abundance (Carvell et al., 2006; Holzschuh et al., 2008; 388 Rundlöf et al., 2008) and can restrict suitable nesting sites (Goulson et al., 2010; Knight et al., 389 2009; Williams et al., 2010).”
Local habitat characteristics but not landscape urbanization drive pollinator visitation and native plant pollination in forest remnants (2013, background): “Second, the quality of the matrix relative to the natural habitat it replaces moderates the effect of land-use change on pollinator populations (Holzschuh et al., 2010; Rundlof et al., 2008; Winfree, 2010).”
Gardens benefit bees and enhance pollination in intensively managed farmland (2011, background): “Interestingly, organic farming has been found to benefit both pollinators (Holzschuh et al., 2008; Rundlöf et al., 2008) and insect-pollinated plants (Gabriel and Tscharntke, 2007).”