Diversity patterns of wild bees and wasps in managed boreal forests: Effects of spatial structure, local habitat and surrounding landscape

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services (2017, background): “Even clear cutting and other disturbances of planted forest that create open environments that are preferred by early successional species that can act as pollinators (Rubene et al. 2015; Taki et al. 2013).”
Cavity-nest boxes for solitary bees: a century of design and research (2017, unknown): “Some of these techniques sample broadly , such as pan traps (Kearns and Inouye 1993; Gezon et al. 2015), window traps (Rubene et al. 2015), Malaise traps (Malaise 1937; Darling and Packer 1988), sweep netting (Richards et al. 2011) and observations of visitors to flowers (Deguines et al. 2016).”
Factors affecting bee communities in forest openings and adjacent mature forest (2017, methodology): “We chose PLAND because landscape composition has been shown to be important in determining bee communities (e.g., Winfree et al., 2007b), but few studies of bees have examined early-successional habitat at a landscape level (see Diaz-Forero et al., 2013 and Rubene et al., 2015).”