Discrepancy between inner and overt speech: Implications for post-stroke aphasia and normal language processing

By S. Geva, S. Bennett, E. Warburton, Karalyn Patterson. 2011

66 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Linguistics

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough

In Social Psychology

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough
3. Simon McCarthy-Jones
4. Simon R. Jones
5. E. Meins
6. Peter Fonagy

In Linguistics

1. Ben Alderson-Day
2. Charles Fernyhough

Citations in the corpus

• Inner Speech: Development, Cognitive Functions, Phenomenology, and Neurobiology (2015, methodology): “The authors argue that this provides evidence of shared mechanisms in overt and inner speech, in contrast to the findings of Geva et al. (2011).”
• How do forward models work? And why would you want them? (2013, unknown): “And though inner and overt speech can diverge, they tend to elicit similar behavioral and neurophysiological effects in other domains (e.g., Kan & Thompson-Schill 2004), and their impairments are highly correlated (e.g., Geva et al. 2011).”