Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President.
By Steve Olson, Donna Gerardi Riordan. 2012
1,366 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cef1cc257642888ab708662cfa865e6625e38ac9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Maura Borrego
- Charles Henderson
- Jeffrey E. Froyd
- Stephanie Cutler
- Benjamin L. Wiggins
- Daniel Z. Grunspan
- B. Kreager
- Sarah Herrmann
Citations in the corpus
- The ICAP Active Learning Framework Predicts the Learning Gains Observed in Intensely Active Classroom Experiences (2017, methodology): “Interrater reliability calculated with the intraclass correlation ranged from moderate to strong depending on the observer pair (0.62–0.85; Landis & Koch, 1977; Portney & Watkins, 2000).”
- The Effects of a Female Role Model on Academic Performance and Persistence of Women in STEM Courses (2016, background): “To meet this demand, American universities need to produce 100,000 additional graduates in STEM fields per year (Holden & Lander, 2012).”
- Fidelity of Implementation of Research‐Based Instructional Strategies (RBIS) in Engineering Science Courses (2013, background): “Additional support for the benefits of peer instruction for both promoting conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in calculus is provided by Pilzer (2001).”
- An integrative review of in-class activities that enable active learning in college science classroom settings (2017, background): “Despite persistent calls for science education reform to incorporate active learning opportunities (Handelsman & Brown, 2016; Olson & Riordan, 2012), the subject can be polarising among faculty (Prince, 2004).”