Hybrid Modeling: New Answers to Old Challenges Introduction to the Special Issue of The Energy Journal

By J. Charles Hourcade, Mark Jaccard, C. Bataille, Frédéric Ghersif. 2006

363 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cee31c0cff851affcf5b6ca60439f2e9a6ceb8dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges (2014, background): “Another important innovation was the development of hybrid models in the 1990s (Hourcade et al., 2006).”
Classification and challenges of bottom-up energy system models - A review (2020, background): “[12] in 2006 proposed a classification of energy models concen-”
The need for national deep decarbonization pathways for effective climate policy (2016, background): “economic top-down models and a minimum level of the technological explicitness of bottom-up models (Hourcade et al., 2006).”
Uncertainty in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) deployment projections: a cross-model comparison exercise (2014, neutral): “(2013) and specifically for the technology focus by Krey et al. (2013). All models run scenarios with and without greenhouse gas stabilization targets in combination with different technology assumptions.”
Distributional and Efficiency Impacts of Clean and Renewable Energy Standards for Electricity (2012, methodology): “Our analysis is also germane to the literature on integrating “top-down” and “bottom-up” models for carbon policy assessment (see, for example, Hourcade et al., 2006, for an overview).”
Mitigation Costs in a Globalized World: Climate Policy Analysis with REMIND-R (2010, methodology): “Hybrid models bridge the gap between conventional top-down and bottomup modeling approaches (Hourcade et al., 2006) and become the preferable tool in supporting policy-making.”
Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials (2009, background): “In recent years, the distinction between the approaches has been reduced and the strengths and weaknesses of both approaches are better recognized (Hourcade et al., 2006; Hourcade and Shukla, 2001).”
The Imaclim-R model: infrastructures, technical inertia and the costs of low carbon futures under imperfect foresight (2012, background): “The consistency of the top-down/bottom-up conversation is guaranteed by a hybrid structure representing the economy in money values and physical quantities (Hourcade et al, 2006).”