Uncertainty in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) deployment projections: a cross-model comparison exercise
By B. Koelbl, M. van den Broek, André P. C. Faaij, D. P. Vuuren. Climatic Change, 2014
118 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Environmental Engineering, Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3de231ed6940c1f135b47122984e86a7b4bfaca2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Environmental Engineering
In Global and Planetary Change
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Three Decades of Climate Mitigation: Why Haven't We Bent the Global Emissions Curve? (2021, unknown): “Model comparison studies have highlighted a central role for significant levels of CCS in mitigation scenarios (100), despite the considerably limited adoption of the technology.”
- Assessment of wind and solar power in global low-carbon energy scenarios: An introduction (2017, background): “While CCS is unavailable for power supply, it remains available in other sectors where there is no direct competition with VRE, such as industrial processes, or the generation of hydrogen or synthetic fuels, see e.g. Koelbl et al. (2014).”
- Buffering Volatility: A Study on the Limits of Germany's Energy Revolution (2017, unknown): “This is less than a tenth 65 Cf. IEA (2016), Scott et al. (2013), Koelbl et al. (2014) and Sinn (2012 , pp. 53–60).”