Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials

By D. V. van Vuuren, M. Hoogwijk, T. Barker, Keywan Riahi, Stefan Boeters, Jean Château, S. Scrieciu, Jasper van Vliet, Toshihiko Masui, K. Blok and 2 more. 2009

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The Fourth Assessment Report of IPCC reports that greenhouse gas emissions can be reduced by about 30-50% in 2030 at costs below 100 US$/tCO2 based on an assessment of both bottom-up and top-down studies. Here, we have looked in more detail into the outcomes of specific models and also analyzed the economic potentials at the sectoral and regional level. At the aggregated level, the findings of the IPCC report are confirmed. However, substantial differences are found at the sectoral level. At the same time, there seems to be no systematic difference in the reduction potential reported by top-down and bottom-up approaches. The largest reduction potential as a response to carbon prices exists in the energy supply sector. Reduction potential in the building sector may carry relatively low costs. Although uncertainties are considerable, the modeling results and the bottom-up analyses all suggest that at the global level around 50% of greenhouse gas emissions may be reduced at carbon price (costs) below 100$/tCO2-eq--but with a wide range of 30-60%. At a carbon price (costs) less than 20$/tCO2-eq, still 10-35% of emissions may be abated. The variation of results is higher at low carbon-price levels than at high levels.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0803b51b4967670bd024ee3dc3bfc9b57fa246c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Environmental Engineering

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) Tools: A State-of-the-Art Review of bottom-up physics-based approaches (2020, background): “The nature of these drivers divides this typology of models in three main subcategories: socio-econometric [37,38], technical [39,40], and physical models [20,41].”
The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs (2010, background): “The economic profile is a medium growth scenario, but with high growth rates for India and China (see van Vuuren et al. , 2009a).”
Fluctuating renewables in a long-term climate change mitigation strategy (2011, methodology): “Based on [1], a price of 15 e/tCO2 is set for 2005 and we assume an exponential increase of 5% per year in accordance with the model interest rate.”