Private Regulation and Trade Union Rights: Why Codes of Conduct Have Limited Impact on Trade Union Rights
By Niklas Egels-Zandén, Jeroen Merk. 2014
112 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce554eccb5329352f048be567bafe7facad68db2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- V. Venkatesh
- Henrik Lindholm
- Kai Kang
- Bill Wang
- A. Zhang
- Ray Y. Zhong
- Niklas Egels-Zandén
- Sven Winkelhaus
Citations in the corpus
- System architecture for blockchain based transparency of supply chain social sustainability (2020, background): “They provide guidelines on how to manage child labor, occupational health and safety, legal minimum wage, the working environment, training and freedom of association, and reducing the exploitation of workers by regulating their working hours and insurance [7, 40, 45-47].”
- Do codes of conduct improve worker rights in supply chains? A study of Fair Wear Foundation (2015, background): “…unions in the initiatives (Anner, 2012; O’Rourke, 2006), and they criticize corporate-influenced initiatives such as FLA, Business Social Compliance Initiative (BSCI), and Global Social Compliance Programme (GSCP) for their limited impact on worker rights (Anner, 2012; Egels-Zandén and Merk, 2013).”