The resurgence of gig work: Historical and theoretical perspectives

By J. Stanford. 2017

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ce12d7b0a386396beb625351b2d7925b24d99054

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. J. Stanford
2. A. Stewart
3. Susan J. Ashford
4. J. Slageren
5. Nikos Koutsimpogiorgos
6. Koen Frenken
7. A. Herrmann
8. Erin Reid

In Public Administration

1. J. Stanford
2. A. Stewart
3. J. Slageren
4. Nikos Koutsimpogiorgos
5. Koen Frenken
6. A. Herrmann
7. A. Veen
8. T. Barratt

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Susan J. Ashford
2. Erin Reid
3. Steve Granger
4. J. Stanford
5. A. Stewart
6. L. Andreu
7. J. Slageren
8. Nikos Koutsimpogiorgos

Citations in the corpus

• The Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey: Selected Findings from Waves 1 to 16 (2018, unknown): “Gig workers are ‘independent workers’ who move from one job, or ‘gig’, to the next utilising digital technology, created and provided by an intermediary business, to connect with purchasers of their services (Stanford, 2017).”
• Conceptualizing the Gig Economy and Its Regulatory Problems (2020, background): “And, when looking at scholars who provide clear ‐ cut conceptualizations of what they regard as the gig economy, substantial differences remain (Healy et al., 2017; Kuhn & Maleki, 2017; Stewart & Stanford, 2017).”
• Working on my own: Measuring the challenges of gig work (2021, background): “These criteria are inclusive as multiple communities of gig workers share these defining characteristics of task/project-based, term-limited, and external work (Katz and Krueger, 2019; Kuhn, 2016; Stanford, 2017).”
• The dark side of the sharing economy: Balancing value co‐creation and value co‐destruction (2020, background): “To address the dark sides of the accommodation 37 sharing economy (Stanford, 2017; Hwang, 2019; Baumber, Scerri, & Schweinsberg, 2019; 38 Richards, Brown, & Dilettuso, 2019; Suess, Woosnam, & Erul, 2020), we need to build 39 knowledge, identify critical factors, and seek to understand what comprises”
• Should we take the gig economy seriously? (2017, background): “One reason is that platform-based work models represent a continuation of longer-term trends (Stanford 2017).”
• Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options? (2017, background): “See Stanford (2017) for more discussion and references on the characteristics of digital work and its historical antecedents.”