Should we take the gig economy seriously?

By J. Healy, Danielle Nicholson, Andreas Pekarek. 2017

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Health Professions, Public Administration, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a069161c42c9babaee0f2b639a4bc26743083afa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Health Professions

1. A. Veen
2. T. Barratt
3. Caleb Goods
4. J. Slageren
5. Nikos Koutsimpogiorgos
6. Koen Frenken
7. A. Herrmann
8. Emmanuel Josserand

In Public Administration

1. J. Slageren
2. A. Veen
3. Nikos Koutsimpogiorgos
4. Koen Frenken
5. T. Barratt
6. A. Herrmann
7. Caleb Goods

In Sociology and Political Science

1. A. Veen
2. T. Barratt
3. Caleb Goods
4. J. Slageren
5. Nikos Koutsimpogiorgos
6. Koen Frenken
7. A. Herrmann
8. Emmanuel Josserand

Citations in the corpus

• “Is your gig any good?” Analysing job quality in the Australian platform-based food-delivery sector (2019, background): “The gig economy is re-kindling historic debates concerning the changing configuration of work and capitalism, and whether these changes represent a Neo-Fordist or Post-Fordist extension (De Stefano, 2016; Healy et al., 2017; Knox and Warhurst, 2015; Rosenblat and Stark, 2016).”
• Conceptualizing the Gig Economy and Its Regulatory Problems (2020, background): “And, when looking at scholars who provide clear ‐ cut conceptualizations of what they regard as the gig economy, substantial differences remain (Healy et al., 2017; Kuhn & Maleki, 2017; Stewart & Stanford, 2017).”