Where is the line between benign and invasive? An examination of psychological barriers to the acceptance of awareness monitoring systems

By David Zweig, J. Webster. 2002

159 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdf53c88d5a4cc62f7cc2504a81c6f5a6f344623

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Heng Xu
2. Bernard C. Y. Tan
3. Hock Hai Teo
4. Ritu Agarwal
5. Princely Ifinedo
6. Chia-Ying Li

In Information Systems and Management

1. Heng Xu
2. Ritu Agarwal
3. Hock Hai Teo
4. Bernard C. Y. Tan
5. Jai-Yeol Son
6. Sung S. Kim
7. James Y. L. Thong
8. Tamara Dinev

In Social Psychology

1. Heng Xu
2. Bernard C. Y. Tan
3. Ritu Agarwal
4. Princely Ifinedo

Citations in the corpus

• Research Note - Effects of Individual Self-Protection, Industry Self-Regulation, and Government Regulation on Privacy Concerns: A Study of Location-Based Services (2012, background): “In the privacy literature, control has been understood as a form of information ownership (Westin 1967) conceptualized as the individual choice to opt in to or opt out of an electronic information exchange environment completely or selectively (Caudill and Murphy 2000), or operationalized as the tec”
• Internet Users' Information Privacy-Protective Responses: A Taxonomy and a Nomological Model (2008, background): “For instance, in situations in which employers monitored their employees for control or for performance evaluation purposes, the employees considered electronic monitoring unfair when they felt high levels of privacy invasion because of the electronic monitoring (Alge 2001; Zweig and Webster 2002).”