Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes : Towards conservation-oriented thinking?

By G. Wilson, K. Hart. 2001

252 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdbef67e952f63e0ede3ebe57e4df866c85adc40

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Carmen Kuczera
2. J. Franks
3. R. Burton
4. G. Schwarz
5. Steven B. Emery
6. P. Bàrberi
7. A. Moonen
8. I. Darnhofer

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. J. Franks
2. Steven B. Emery
3. R. Burton
4. I. Darnhofer
5. G. Schwarz
6. U. H. Paragahawewa
7. W. Schneeberger
8. F. Runge

In Small Animals

1. Carmen Kuczera
2. J. Franks
3. R. Burton
4. G. Schwarz
5. Steven B. Emery

Citations in the corpus

• Private Landowner Conservation Behavior Following Participation in Voluntary Incentive Programs: Recommendations to Facilitate Behavioral Persistence (2018, background): “Landowner attitudes and attitude changes have long been considered important for behavioral outcomes before and after conservation programs (Morris & Potter 1995; Wilson & Hart 2001).”
• Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri‐environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective (2007, background): “This farmers’ ‘participation spectrum’ has been further analysed by also checking some structural and household factors related to participation (see, e.g. Wilson, 1996; Wilson and Hart, 2000).”
• Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes (2011, background): “The role of policy in changing attitudes is thus more an assumed (e.g. Lowe et al., 1999; Wilson and Hart, 2001; Directorate General for Agriculture, 1998) than prescribed one.”
• Exploring Farmers' Cultural Resistance to Voluntary Agri-environmental Schemes (2008, methodology): “For example, researchers have suggested attitudinal change could be used as a measure of agri-environmental scheme success (Wilson and Hart 2001) and in its document, Evaluation of agri-environment programmes, the European Union’s agricultural research programme suggests that pro-environmental attit”
• The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers’ concerns with current schemes? (2012, background): “…that has highlighted the practical issues for farmers of AESs that impose what are seen as inflexible and inappropriate blanket prescriptions that take no account of geographical differences or the changeability of the weather (Sutherland, 2010; Wilson and Hart, 2000; Wilson and Hart, 2001).”
• Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria:Farmer types and their rationale (2005, background): “Indeed, farmers’ attitudes are likely to change and evolve once organic production is attempted (Wilson and Hart, 2001; Padel, 2002), and the relationship between motivation and conduct can be seen as one of mutual influence (Schoon and Te Grotenhuis, 2000).”
• Functional biodiversity in the agricultural landscape: relationships between weeds and arthropod fauna. (2010, background): “Institutional design of contracts differs among EU member states and regions but AES, even when tailormade to regional environmental issues, are generally not selected on the basis of commonly agreed criteria (Wilson & Hart, 2002).”