Creating culturally sustainable agri-environmental schemes

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Private Landowner Conservation Behavior Following Participation in Voluntary Incentive Programs: Recommendations to Facilitate Behavioral Persistence (2018, background): “Yet, empirical evidence of landowner attitude change from conservation program participation has been mixed (Burton & Paragahawewa 2011).”
What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis (2015, background): “Current evidence, however, seems to suggest that the voluntary nature of AESs may not necessarily be effective in inducing permanent changes to farmers’ attitudes and behaviour with respect to sustainable environmental management (Burton et al., 2008; Burton and Paragahawewa, 2011).”
Toward effective nature conservation on farmland: making farmers matter (2013, background): “Although there are positive examples from across Europe that illustrate how dedicated conservation efforts can produce considerable ecological gains (Wrbka et al. 2008; La Haye et al. 2010; Baker et al. 2012; Pywell et al. 2012), many people involved in AESs believe that AESs are not always as benef”
The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers’ concerns with current schemes? (2012, background): “Burton and Paragahawewa (2011) have made a commendable call for AESs to be more „culturally sustainable‟.”