Factors Affecting Farmers’ Participation in Agri‐environmental Measures: A Northern Italian Perspective

492 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis (2015, methodology): “Farmers’ experiences with past AESs and other environmentally-friendly farming practices has been shown in several studies to have a significant effects on farmers’ willingness to adopt a new AES (Wilson and Hart, 2000; Ducos et al., 2009; Defrancesco et al., 2008; Hynes and Garvey, 2009).”
Deconstructing the ‘young farmer problem in Europe’: Towards a research agenda (2015, background): “Morris and Potter, 1995), and others reluctance to commit (Defrancesco et al., 2008).”
Agri-environment contract adoption under fixed and variable compliance costs (2009, background): “Many studies have considered factors influencing farmers’ participation in AESs (Defrancesco et al. 2008), but none have explained why smaller farms are less likely to participate in such schemes.”
How should we incentivize private landowners to ‘produce’ more biodiversity? (2012, background): “Defrancesco et al. (2008) present an econometric analysis of the factors affecting AES participation in Italy.”
The role of agri-environment schemes in conservation and environmental management (2015, background): “Studies on motivations of farmers to take up AES or environmental management have repeatedly demonstrated that farmer attitudes are important in explaining uptake of environmental measures (e.g., Defrancesco et al. 2008; Sattler & Nagel 2010).”