Academic patenting in Europe: new evidence from the KEINS database

By Francesco Lissoni, Patrick Llerena, Maureen McKelvey, B. Sanditov. 2008

339 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdbcbb7bdfe8bf7aac4a26d6f4332bcd33bf854a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Finding the Right Partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions (2013, background): “See, among others, Lissoni et al. 2008, Crespi et al., 2010. and of the characteristics of firms that are involved in one or the other mode of interaction is needed in order to develop policies in support for institutional interactions only when the knowledge needs of firms are not met either by…”
The nexus between science and industry: evidence from faculty inventions (2012, background): “Lissoni et al. (2008) estimate that the share of academic patents directly assigned to corporations ranges from 60% to 80% in Europe, whereas licensing activities of European universities as reported by ProTon (2006) is negligibly small.8 The significance of these direct science-industry knowledge…”
Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting (2010, methodology): “…years, and there is an ongoing effort to standardize the different national databases, based on the guidelines developed for the KEINS database (Lissoni et al., 2008), which matches names of university scientists with the lists of inventors on EPO patent applications.7 Quasi-standardized…”
Demographic patterns and trends in patenting: Gender, age, and education of inventors (2014, methodology): “…data on inventors from patent data can be divided into four categories: i) survey methods, ii) identification of inventors, iii) links to register data and iv) Analyses of CVs, used to analyze academic inventors (Lissoni 2010; Lissoni et al. 2008) and a sample of Italian inventors (Lenzi 2009).”
Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting (2011, methodology): “Following Lissoni et al. (2008), academic patenting refers to both forms of patenting, while university patenting refers exclusively to patents directly owned/applied for by a university.”
Chinese university patents: quantity, quality, and the role of subsidy programs (2014, neutral): “2012) several authors indicate that they only capture a fraction of all academic patents (e.g., Geuna and Nesta 2006; Lissoni et al. 2008).”
University Patenting in Germany before and after 2002: What Role Did the Professors' Privilege Play? (2012, background): “These different assignment types have to be taken into consideration when discussing the changed incentives faced by university inventors after the 2002 reform.”
Complements or Substitutes? The Role of Universities and Local Context in Supporting the Creation of Academic Spin-offs (2011, neutral): “Although several scholars have worked on either university patenting (e.g., Baldini, 2011a; Baldini et al., 2006; Breschi et al., 2008; Lissoni et al., 2008) or spin-off creation (e.g., Baldini, 2011b; Colombo et al., 2010; Fini et al., 2009; Lockett et al., 2005; Moray and Clarysse, 2005; Nosella…”
Mobility of Skilled Workers and Co-Invention Networks: An Anatomy of Localized Knowledge Flows (2009, neutral): “For European evidence, see Lissoni et al. (2008) .”