Cracking the MJO nut

By Chidong Zhang, Jon Gottschalck, E. Maloney, M. Moncrieff, F. Vitart, Duane Waliser, Bin Wang, M. Wheeler. 2013

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdb9350a5e4b4911d86688089904b7524224059d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

1. Chidong Zhang
2. Duane Waliser
3. F. Vitart
4. E. Maloney
5. David A. Randall
6. Daehyun Kim
7. C. DeMott
8. Á. Adames

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Duane Waliser
2. Chidong Zhang
3. F. Vitart
4. E. Maloney
5. David A. Randall
6. Daehyun Kim
7. C. DeMott
8. Á. Adames

Citations in the corpus

• Global‐scale convective aggregation: Implications for the Madden‐Julian Oscillation (2015, background): “The MJO is the dominant form of tropical intraseasonal variability, but a theory accounting for its major features remains elusive [Zhang, 2005; Zhang et al., 2013].”
• Predictability of the Madden–Julian Oscillation in the Intraseasonal Variability Hindcast Experiment (ISVHE)* (2014, background): “Pastmultimodel assessments ofmodel performance for theMJO (e.g., Slingo et al. 1996; Lin et al. 2006; Kim et al. 2009; Zhang et al. 2013) have indicated that inadequacies in cumulus parameterization schemes (e.g., Maloney and Hartmann 2001; Liu et al. 2005; Vitart et al. 2007), coarse vertical…”
• Fifty Years of Research on the Madden‐Julian Oscillation: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives (2020, background): “…(ICTP, 2006), the MJO has been a central focus of multinational research projects endorsed by the World Weather Research Program (WWRP), the World Climate Research Program (WCRP), and by International and US CLIVAR (Climate Variability and Predictability) (see a review by C. Zhang et al., 2013).”
• A Comparison of OLR and Circulation-Based Indices for Tracking the MJO (2014, methodology): “Although much progress has been made in understanding and forecasting the MJO over the past four decades, it remains a significant outstanding problem in tropical meteorology (see Zhang et al. 2013).”
• Structure and Properties of Madden–Julian Oscillations Deduced from DYNAMO Sounding Arrays (2013, unknown): “) (Yoneyama et al. 2013; Zhang et al. 2013).”
• Atmosphere‐ocean coupled processes in the Madden‐Julian oscillation (2015, methodology): “The MJO may drive and respond to air-sea interactions over the Maritime Continent, which is home to a variety of oceanic and atmospheric processes that may impact the ocean feedbacks to the atmosphere [Zhang et al., 2013].”
• Prediction of the Madden–Julian Oscillation: A Review (2018, background): “The intraseasonal predictability and prediction skill from the ISVHE hindcasts have been documented in a series of papers (Zhang et al. 2013; Neena et al. 2014; Lee et al. 2015; Lee and Wang 2016).”