Predictability of the Madden–Julian Oscillation in the Intraseasonal Variability Hindcast Experiment (ISVHE)*
By J. M. Neena, June‐Yi Lee, Duane Waliser, Bin Wang, Xianan Jiang. 2014
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/379641e8deaf47edf7f590d02e8436891fed453d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
In Oceanography
Citations in the corpus
- The MJO as a Dispersive, Convectively Coupled Moisture Wave: Theory and Observations (2016, unknown): “…studies have shown that there is a gap of 20–25 days between the potential and practical predictability of the MJO (H.-M. Kim et al. 2014; Neena et al. 2014), suggesting that improving MJO simulation would result in a more accurate forecast of it as well as other phenomena that are…”
- Madden—Julian Oscillation prediction and teleconnections in the S2S database (2017, methodology): “Using reforecasts from eight models in the Intraseasonal Variability Hindcast Experiment (ISVHE), Neena et al. (2014) found that the predictive skill limit of the dynamical models was 5 – 10 days lower than the potential predictability limit, measured by verifying against an ensemble member…”
- Predictability and prediction skill of the boreal summer intraseasonal oscillation in the Intraseasonal Variability Hindcast Experiment (2015, methodology): “In addition, following Neena et al. (2014a), the observed signal at day 0 is presented by green circle in each panel of Fig.”
- Modulation of the boreal wintertime Madden‐Julian oscillation by the stratospheric quasi‐biennial oscillation (2016, unknown): “Despite the improvement in MJO theory and dynamical prediction, the current generation of climate models does not produce skillful MJO predictions yet, while the MJO is potentially much more predictable [Neena et al., 2014].”
- Fifty Years of Research on the Madden‐Julian Oscillation: Recent Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives (2020, methodology): “…2018; Neena et al., 2014; Rashid et al., 2011; K.‐H. Seo et al., 2009; Vitart & Molteni, 2010; W. Wang et al., 2014; Xiang, Zhao, et al., 2015), in contrast to its estimated intrinsic potential predictability of about 5–7 weeks (e.g., Ding et al., 2010; Neena et al., 2014; Waliser et al., 2003).”
- Prediction of the Madden–Julian Oscillation: A Review (2018, methodology): “The intraseasonal predictability and prediction skill from the ISVHE hindcasts have been documented in a series of papers (Zhang et al. 2013; Neena et al. 2014; Lee et al. 2015; Lee and Wang 2016).”