The Importance of the Raw Idea in Innovation: Testing the Sow's Ear Hypothesis
By Laura J. Kornish, Karl T. Ulrich. 2014
164 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cda26e468632e3353505483835d3586893373c41
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Sociology and Political Science
- L. Beril Toktay
- Basak Kalkanci
- Viswanathan Vish Krishnan
- Justin M. Berg
- Jennifer S. Mueller
- Morvarid Rahmani
- Cheryl J. Wakslak
- Jacinta M. Gau
Citations in the corpus
- Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas (2014, result): “This is consistent with the recent empirical work of Kornish & Ulrich (2012) who found that highly experienced experts were not very good at predicting the success potential of an idea.”
- Balancing on the Creative Highwire (2016, background): “To measure the underlying quality of creators’ videos, I followed other scholars who have defined quality as audience appeal that is intrinsic to the ideas themselves (Reeves and Bednar, 1994; Salganik, Dodds, and Watts, 2006; Kornish and Ulrich, 2014).”
- The Role of Inclusive Innovation in Promoting Social Sustainability (2019, background): “In order to generate ideas for needs of the excluded population, one natural way is to include that population in the ideation process (Kornish and Ulrich 2014, Von Hippel 1986).”