Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State

By J. Roberts. 2000

536 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd05779e14f5d38d7b6c48ba8678148787f25fd6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Policy feedback and support for the welfare state (2013, background): “Rothstein (1998, 2002) distinguishes between two distinct approaches to the incorporation of individuals into the welfare state.”
Trust and the development of health care as a social institution. (2003, background): “Such legitimacy is reflected in the extent to which citizens tolerate the interventions of public organisations, accept these organisations’ decisions when they are aimed at influencing citizen behaviour and co-operate with the organisations to achieve their goals (Rothstein, 1998).”
Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origin and Structure of Heuristics and Biases in Politics (2015, background): “Rothstein (1998) argues that the heuristic is learned from certain institutional arrangements.”
The social justice implications of privatisation in education governance frameworks: a relational account (2013, background): “This makes it all the more important that as far as possible education is a ‘just institution’ (Rothstein, 1998).”
Trust in the Capability of the Welfare State and General Welfare State Support: Sweden 1997-2002 (2006, background): “When searching for explanations that can account for these differences, it is widely believed that institutional theory represents a promising line of inquiry (Korpi, 1980; March and Olsen, 1984; Pierson, 1993; Steinmo, 1994; Rothstein, 1998).”
The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes (2008, background): “Following Rothstein (1998), the first step of the argument is simply to point to the fact that a selective policy that aims to provide ‘the needy’ with economic resources must determine 1) who is needy, and 2) how much they need.”
Why Do Welfare States Persist? (2006, methodology): “We use the ratio of government spending on aggregated benefits and services relative to gross domestic product to measure the policy output of 3For instance, in the key cases of Sweden (e.g., Kautto et al. 2001; Lindbom 2001) and the United States (e.g., Hacker 2002; Weaver 2000), programmatic…”
How three narratives of modernity justify economic inequality (2016, background): “The Nordic countries in particular are famous for having state institutions that provide this kind of (perceived) procedural justice (Rothstein, 1998).”
The New Institutionalism (2010, background): “In other words, Historical Institutionalists are first interested in explaining an outcome (say, for example, why France and Britain have pursued such different styles of industrial Policy (Hall 1986) or why some welfare states generate more popular support than others (Rothstein 1998) ) they THEN p”
A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change (2009, background): “Most long-surviving resource regimes select some of their own monitors, who are accountable to the appropriators or are appropriators themselves and who keep an eye on resource conditions as well as on harvesting activities.”
The social capital of European welfare states: the crowding out hypothesis revisited (2005, unknown): “First steps in this direction have already been made; for instance, by Rothstein, where on the basis of Swedish evidence he advances the hypothesis that people’s experiences with universal social programmes tend to stimulate their trust in institutions, while personal experiences with selective prog”