Individual differences in compensatory decision-making style and need for closure as correlates of subjective decision complexity and difficulty

By S. Shiloh, Shelly Koren, D. Zakay. 2001

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbd2398c8a2842db13859a7a8df5b425dddb1f55

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Michel J. J. Handgraaf
2. Elke U. Weber
3. Kirstin C Appelt
4. Kerry F. Milch
5. S. McClelland

In General Decision Sciences

1. Michel J. J. Handgraaf
2. Elke U. Weber
3. Kirstin C Appelt
4. Kerry F. Milch
5. S. van der Linden
6. Dan Kahan
7. P. Stern
8. Paul Slovic

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Michel J. J. Handgraaf
2. Elke U. Weber
3. S. McClelland
4. S. van der Linden
5. P. Stern
6. Dan Kahan
7. C. Ogunbode
8. J. Reser

Citations in the corpus

• The Decision Making Individual Differences Inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research (2011, background): “There are frequent calls to study the effects of individual differences on decision processes and outcomes in order to rectify what has been seen as an overemphasis on decision features and situation factors (e.g., Levin, 1999; Mo-hammed & Schwall, 2009; Scott & Bruce, 1995; Shiloh et al., 2001).”
• Who is the “Self” in Self Reports of Sexual Satisfaction? Research and Policy Implications (2011, background): “1 Non-compensatory processes are defined as those decisions which, “aim at a ‘good enough’ rather than the best choice” (Shiloh et al. 2001, p. 701). Sex Res Soc Policy (2011) 8:304–320 311”