The effects of marbling on flavour and juiciness scores of cooked beef, after adjusting to a constant tenderness
By J. Thompson. 2004
196 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb82af55f2b274839ef931169132b68daba1c610
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Animal Science and Zoology
In Nutrition and Dietetics
Citations in the corpus
- Intramuscular fat content in meat-producing animals: development, genetic and nutritional control, and identification of putative markers. (2010, background): “However, when variations in tenderness are controlled , the contribution of marbling to palatability is more important due to its specific contribution to juiciness (about 38.4% of the variation; Jeremiah et al., 2003b) and flavour (Thompson, 2004).”
- Innovations in beef production systems that enhance the nutritional and health value of beef lipids and their relationship with meat quality. (2006, background): “50) than tenderness, flavour or juiciness scores (see reviews of Burrow, Moore, Johnston, Barense, & Bindon, 2001; Hocquette, Renand, Levéziel, Picard, & Cassar-Malek, 2005), and whilst IMF content is often positively correlated to tenderness, especially when large numbers of animals are studied (Th”