Endogenous economic voting: evidence from the 1997 British election
By C. Anderson, S. Mendes, Yuliya V. Tverdova. 2004
181 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Communication, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb6b1adf0ef94b060628e287b46ccba7c2e2b7d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Communication
- James Tilley
- S. Hobolt
- Susan Banducci
- Geoffrey Evans
- Mark Pickup
- C. Anderson
- Mark A. Kayser
- Michael S. Lewis-Beck
In Political Science and International Relations
- S. Hobolt
- James Tilley
- Susan Banducci
- C. Anderson
- Mark A. Kayser
- Christopher Wlezien
- Geoffrey Evans
- Robert Andersen
In Sociology and Political Science
- James Tilley
- S. Hobolt
- C. Anderson
- Mark A. Kayser
- Robert Andersen
- Geoffrey Evans
- Christopher Wlezien
- Arjun S. Wilkins
Citations in the corpus
- The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions (2006, background): “Secondly, if the intellectual appeal of the economic voting model is that it confirms fundamental notions of democratic accountability—voters respond to objective indicators of government performance and reward or punish as appropriate (Anderson et al. 2004; Mutz 1998)—then evidence questioning the ”
- Clarity of responsibility: How government cohesion conditions performance voting (2013, background): “Some have also challenged the existing economic literature by arguing that the strong relationship between economic evaluations and vote choice has been overstated since people’s perceptions of policy performance are shaped by their political orientation – notably partisanship (Anderson et al. 2004;”
- Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote (2011, background): “Do differences in individuals’ assessment of the economy influence their support for the government or do partisans’ judgment of the government, for cognitive or more purely ‘psychological’ reasons, produce corresponding economic perceptions? This remains an actively contested debate with many recen”
- Mecro-Economic Voting: Local Information and Micro-Perceptions of the Macro-Economy (2014, unknown): “Thus, in Section 5.2 we use variation in exposure to media as a further test of mecro-economic voting theory.20”
- The End of Economic Voting? Contingency Dilemmas and the Limits of Democratic Accountability (2007, result): “Thus, partisans are likely to form evaluations of the state of the economy to be consistent with their previously held beliefs (Anderson et al. 2004, Borre 1997, Evans & Andersen 2006, Pattie & Johnston 2001, Wlezien et al. 1997).”
- Reversing the Causal Arrow: The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions in the 2000–2004 U.S. Presidential Election Cycle (2010, background): “Anderson et al. (2004) examine economic perceptions in both preand postelection surveys and find that evaluations of the economy’s past and future performance are adjusted retrospectively to make them consistent with vote choice so that they ‘‘cease being exogenous .”