Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language
By A. Graesser, Danielle S. McNamara, Max M. Louwerse, Zhiqiang Cai. Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers, 2004
1,521 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb42704113df4cbff874806cdf4a9f05d5f8065f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Danielle S. McNamara
- K. Kyle
- A. Graesser
- S. D’Mello
- Tom Salsbury
- Max M. Louwerse
- P. M. McCarthy
Citations in the corpus
- Automatic Measurement of Syntactic Complexity Using the Revised Developmental Level Scale (2008, methodology): “Graesser et al. (2004) developed a software package, Coh-Metrix, which calculates the coherence of texts using a wide range of measures, including three indexes of syntactic complexity: mean number of modifiers per noun phrase; mean number of higher level constituents per sentence, controlling for…”
- Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders (2012, neutral): “Once the general goal structure was developed and events were included to expand on this goal structure, the texts were entered into Coh-Metrix (Graesser et al., 2004), a computer tool that analyzes texts for cohesion, language (such as parts of speech, word frequency, and semantics), and…”
- Automatically Assessing Lexical Sophistication: Indices, Tools, Findings, and Application (2015, methodology): “The freely available online version of Coh-Metrix, for example, despite reporting a number of lexical indices, can process only one text at a time, practically limiting the number of texts that can be examined.”
- Language comprehension is both embodied and symbolic (2008, methodology): “Recently, LSA has been used as a measure of coherence in Coh-Metrix (Graesser et al. 2004; Louwerse et al. 2004), an internetbased tool that analyses texts on over 50 types of cohesion relations and over 200 measures of language, text, and readability.”
- Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing proficiency (2010, background): “Keywords: Coherence; Writing Quality; Cohesion, Linguistics, Computational Algorithms, Models.”
- Predicting Second Language Writing Proficiency: The Roles of Cohesion and Linguistic Sophistication (2012, methodology): “Sentences with difficult syntactic constructions include the use of embedded constituents and are often structurally dense, syntactically ambiguous or ungrammatical (Graesser et al., 2004).”
- Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview (2020, methodology): “Many of these tools have been developed for non-specialist in order to increase access to NLP analyses (e.g., Crossley, Kyle & Dascalu, in press; Graesser, McNamara, Louwerse, & Cai, 2004; Kyle & Crossley, 2017; Kyle, Crossley, & Berger, 2018).”
- Automatic Evaluation of Linguistic Quality in Multi-Document Summarization (2010, methodology): “The Coh-Metrix tool 5 provides an implementation of 54 features known in the psycholinguistic literature to correlate with the coherence of human-written texts (Graesser et al., 2004).”