Making Climate HOT

By S. Moser, Lisa Dilling. 2004

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb2f4dd7e3ba1cc5970b0c9bdb7051b69496b905

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. John D. Sterman
2. L. Sweeney

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Z. Janet Yang
2. L. Rickard
3. Mihye Seo
4. Russell Spears
5. Teresa M. Harrison
6. Martijn van Zomeren
7. J. Reser
8. C. Leach

Citations in the corpus

• Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis (2010, background): “Unlike smoking and safer sex, however, one can perceive the climate crisis as a collective problem that requires collective action (Hardin, 1968; Moser & Dilling, 2004; Olson, 1968).”
• Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter (2007, background): “…and respected elites, media influence, and emotions, not only rational judgments of costs and benefits (Kempton, 1993; Kempton, Boster, and Hartley, 1995; Kasemir, et al., 2000; Slovic, 2000; Stoll-Kleemann, O’Riordan, and Jaeger, 2001; Meijnders, Midden, and Wilke, 2001, Moser and Dilling, 2004).”
• Applying the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model to Examine Support for Climate Change Mitigation Policy (2014, background): “Climate change frequently fails to draw attention, as the issue appears unrelated to any immediate, obvious personal difficulties; many individuals have heard of global warming, but far fewer are personally concerned, affected, or inspired to act (Gifford, 2011; Moser & Dilling, 2004).”
• Effects of Goal Framing and Emotions on Perceived Threat and Willingness to Sacrifice for Climate Change (2017, background): “Many scholars emphasize that emotions may help create a greater sense of urgency for abstract and distant climate change outcomes (Markowitz & Shariff, 2012; Moser & Dilling, 2004; Roeser, 2012).”
• Political Science and Prediction: What's Next for U.S. Climate Change Policy? (2007, background): “9 Although polls should be interpreted cautiously, many analysts have stressed the need for better public education and improved communication between scientific and technical experts and the general public (Skolnikoff, 1999; Victor, 2004; Moser & Dilling, 2004).”
• Preaching to different choirs: How to motivate dismissive, uncommitted, and alarmed audiences to adapt to climate change? (2016, background): “…beliefs about climate change (Hine et al., 2013a; Maibach et al., 2011; Morrison et al., 2013; Reser et al., 2012), and climate change communicators should take this diversity into account when crafting and targeting their messages (Hine et al., 2014; Moser & Dilling, 2004; Whitmarsh et al., 2011).”