Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: An organizing framework
By Aurélien Acquier, Thibault Daudigeos, J. Pinkse. 2017
672 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ca45cf030b15c25d8e2729ce27f97fff6961bd5c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Automotive Engineering
- Francesca Ciulli
- Ans Kolk
- Koen Frenken
- Marko P. Hekkert
- Christian Sandström
- Christofer Laurell
- Julian Kirchherr
In Marketing
- Julian Kirchherr
- Ruth Carrasco-Gallego
- Gustavo Morales-Alonso
- Meisam Ranjbari
- Marko P. Hekkert
- Francesca Ciulli
- Ans Kolk
- F. Marimon
In Sociology and Political Science
- Ruth Carrasco-Gallego
- Gustavo Morales-Alonso
- Meisam Ranjbari
- Francesca Ciulli
- Ans Kolk
- Daan Schraven
- Koen Frenken
- Paul Schneider
Citations in the corpus
- Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed research agenda for a nascent field (2018, background): “Considering the bias towards customers in research on the share economy (Acquier et al. 2017), researchers may 1 3 Managerial challenges of Industry 4.0: an empirically backed… want to concentrate on the supplier side and investigate how firms establish share economy business models and develop the…”
- Incumbents and business model innovation for the sharing economy: Implications for sustainability (2019, background): “From an environmental perspective, the sharing economy has been argued to promote a more efficient use of resources by substituting ownership with access and fostering the use of under-utilized assets (Acquier et al., 2017; Botsman and Rogers, 2010; Heinrichs, 2013; Martin, 2016; Plewnia and Guenthe”
- Digital Disruption beyond Uber and Airbnb—Tracking the long tail of the sharing economy (2020, background): “, 2017), and paradoxes of the sharing economy (Acquier et al., 2017), as well as comparing media content regarding specific sharing-economy actors (Laurell and Sandström, 2018).”
- The battle of the buzzwords: A comparative review of the circular economy and the sharing economy concepts (2021, background): “While some authors believe that SE contributes to sustainable growth (Bonciu and Bâlgăr, 2016), other recent scholarly works contest this theory (Acquier, 2017; Martin, 2016; Schor, 2014, 2017; Yeomans, 2015).”
- A decade of the sharing economy: Concepts, users, business and governance perspectives (2020, neutral): “The sharing economy phenomenon has been growing for over a decade (Acquier et al., 2017; Frenken and Schor, 2017; Zvolska et al., 2019).”
- A Systematic Literature Review. Relationships between the Sharing Economy, Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals (2020, background): “The sharing economy can be placed on three foundational cores: (a) access economy, (b) platform economy and (c) community-based economy [6].”
- Conceptualizing the Sharing Economy through Presenting a Comprehensive Framework (2018, background): “…although Schor (2014) believes that “coming up with a solid definition of the SE that reflects common usage is nearly impossible” [30] (p. 2) and Acquier et al. (2017) believes that the SE needs an organizing framework rather than a new definition [91], both a comprehensive definition and…”