Prospective analysis of technological innovation systems: Identifying technological and organizational development options for biogas in Switzerland

By J. Markard, Martin Stadelmann, Bernhard Truffer. 2009

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9c3cdfcf7eb4e0f6f9ac1d33b5e2013d4f8ff24

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

In Global and Planetary Change

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Evolutionary approaches for sustainable innovation policies: From niche to paradigm? (2009, background): “…model involves analysis of a range of system functions for assessing their performance, and has been applied to study dynamics of environmental innovation in the energy sector (Bergek et al., 2006; Hekkert et al., 2007; Jacobsson and Bergek, 2004; see also the contribution of Markard et al., 2009).”
Informal institutions matter: Professional culture and the development of biogas technology (2013, background): “Biogas technology has repeatedly been analyzed by scholars in the field of innovation studies (Decker et al., 2007; Geels and Raven, 2006, 2007; Markard et al., 2009; Negro et al., 2007; Negro and Hekkert, 2008; Raven, 2004; Raven and Geels, 2010; Raven and Gregersen, 2007).”
Transition failure: Understanding continuity in the automotive industry (2012, background): “As a result, emergent diversity poses new challenges and opportunities in terms of identifying ‘coherent’ socio-technical and organizational innovations within a given field [47].”
Shaping selection environments for industrial catch-up and sustainability transitions: A systemic perspective on endogenizing windows of opportunity (2019, background): “…of a 284 homogenous technology (which is the focus of the majority of existing TIS studies), but also enables 285 to ask how potential alternative trajectories can gain predominance in the course of system 286 development (as exemplified by Wirth et al. 2013, or Markard et al. 2009, for instance).”
Conceptualizing leapfrogging with spatially coupled innovation systems: The case of onsite wastewater treatment in China (2012, background): “, how well it contributes to the generation, diffusion and utilization of a new technology, has therefore received considerable attention in the past few years [39, 50-52].”
The technological innovation systems framework: Response to six criticisms (2015, background): “…on system building (Hellsmark and Jacobsson, 2009; Musiolik and Markard, 2011; Musiolik et al., 2012), international ties within TIS (Bento and Fontes, 2015; Binz et al., 2014), and suggestions for the analysis of TIS contexts (Bergek et al., 2015; Markard et al., 2009; Wirth and Markard, 2011).”