The determinants of municipal tax rates in British Columbia

By C. Brett, Joris Pinkse. 2000

268 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c9a326d31f1ae7732164b5898b2797d469806290

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

On Spatial Public Finance Empirics (2005, background): “In this regard, Brett and Pinkse (2000) do find a significant positive relationship between the business property tax rates of municipalities in the Canadian province of British Columbia.”
Issues in Spatial Data Analysis (2010, background): “7Bordignon, Cerniglia, and Revelli (2003), Brett and Pinkse (2000), Brueckner (1998), Brueckner and Saavedra (2001), Case, Rosen, and Hines (1993), Fredriksson and Millimet (2002), Millimet and Rangaprasad (2007), and Saavedra (2000) are examples of good applications of the spatial lag model. Brueck”
FDI determination and corporate tax competition in a volatile world (2010, unknown): “Similarly to the specication in Brett and Pinkse [8], the 18Similar results, though slightly less precise, are obtained when employing the nominal interest rate volatility.”
THE FUTURE OF SPATIAL ECONOMETRICS (2010, unknown): “…replacing independence assumptions by conditional moment conditions, allowing for some dependence between uand X and between different elements of u (Brett and Pinkse, 2000), and indeed allowing for nonlinear parametric specifications (e.g., Conley, 1999; Pinkse, Slade, and Shen, 2006; Lee, 2007).”
Who Do You Blame in Local Finance? An Analysis of Municipal Financing in Italy (2010, unknown): “−sH(τ∗))(1− εh(τ∗))2 − seετ (τ∗) < 0 (12)”
In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting (2003, background): “[23], Brett and Pinkse [16], Saavedra [32], Revelli [29–31], and Sole-”
Public spending interactions and local politics. Empirical evidence from French municipalities (2008, methodology): “…2005, in Switzerland; Bordignon et al. 2003, in Italy; Solé-Ollé 2003, in Spain, and Feld et al. 2002, in France), as well as using US States and Canadian provincial datasets (for example Brett and Pinske 2000, in Canada or Brueckner and Saavedra 2001, or Shughart and Tollison 1991, in the US).”
Expenditure spillovers and fiscal interactions: Empirical evidence from local governments in Spain (2006, background): “3 These papers can be included within a broader strand of empirical literature analyzing strategic interactions subnational governments (see Brueckner [12] for a survey), but most of them focus on tax interactions (Besley a [5], Brett and Pinkse [11], Buettner, [14] and Brueckner and Saavedra [13]) ”
Horizontal And Vertical Indirect Tax Competition : Theory And Some Evidence From The Usa (2007, unknown): “US (Brueckner, 1998; Brett and Pinkse, 2000; Heyndels and Vuchelen, 1998).”
Tax Mimicking and Yardstick Competition Among Local Governments in the Netherlands (2005, background): “Brett and Pinkse (2000) Municipalities, British Columbia (Canada) Business property tax (tax rates) IV Mixed results depending on model and weighting matrix applied”
Functional-coefficient spatial autoregressive models with nonparametric spatial weights (2016, methodology): “Tax competition models (e.g., Brett and Pinkse, 2000; Brueckner and Saavedra, 2001) are taken as a well-known example in the resource- ow model framework, while public expenditure spillover in Case et al. (1993) and economic growth spillover in Er- tur and Koch (2007) are examples in the spillover…”