Optimal Dutch disease

By Egil Matsen, Ragnar Torvik. 2005

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c974724499528b1df1ab08cd061317d11f392445

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Cursing the blessings? Natural resource abundance, institutions, and economic growth (2008, unknown): “…by Stijns (2003), who conﬁrms the typical sectoral change pattern but ﬁnds little evidence for overall negative resource eﬀects on growth; and by Matsen and Torvik (2005), who propose that long-term growth can be positive provided the savings path is adjusted to take into account the relative…”
Further investigation of natural resources and economic growth: Do natural resources depress economic growth? (2013, background): “They include Krugman (1987); Matsuyama (1992); Gylfason (2001); Torvik (2001); Matsen and Torvik (2005).”
Environment, Human Development and Economic Growth (2008, background): “Normally, the term refers to adverse effects on the traded sector when resources income pushes domestic demand up and adverse effects on economic growth following the reallocation of production factors (Matsen and Torvik, 2005).”
Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing? (2011, background): “indicates that after a windfall, one should gradually adjust the optimal share of national wealth consumed downwards and accept some adverse Dutch disease effects (Matsen and Torvik, 2005).”
Is a negative correlation between resource abundance and growth sufficient evidence that there is a “resource curse”? (2011, background): “For example, learning by 2001), and Matsen and Torvik (2005), and i cturing in Sachs and Warner (1999) and Me 999), Gylfason (2001) and Bravo-Ortega an hat low growth and income levels could be lation.”
The Structural Manifestation of the 'Dutch Disease’: The Case of Oil Exporting Countries (2010, methodology): “The Dutch Disease Across Industries with Different Capital Intensities: Using Eqn(15) 36”
Natural resource dependence, human capital accumulation, and economic growth: A combined explanation for the resource curse and the resource blessing (2014, background): “Some related studies regarded natural resources as “Manna from heaven” or “windfalls” and ignored their exploitation cost (e.g., Sachs and Warner, 1995; Matsen and Torvik, 2005; Papyrakis and Gerlagh, 2006), whereas others introduced natural resources into the production function of the final goods ”
Corruption in natural resource management: Implications for policy makers (2009, background): “And even in the presence of such effects, some level of Dutch disease is optimal since resource extraction allows higher consumption (Davis, 1995; Matsen and Torvik, 2005).”
Cursed by Resources or Institutions (2006, unknown): “Dutch disease models, like those by van Wijnbergen (1984), Krugman (1987) and Sachs and Warner (1995) predict a monotonic relationship between resources and growth (see Torvik 2001 for a discussion of the Dutch disease models, and Matsen and Torvik 2005 for the optimal intertemporal use of resourc”
Challenges and Opportunities for Resource Rich Economies (2006, unknown): “…learning by doing, finite planning horizons and Dutch disease effects that suggest that after a natural resource discovery, the optimal share of national wealth consumed should be gradually adjusted downwards over time and some Dutch disease effects should be accepted (Matsen and Torvik, 2005).”
When and Why Worry About Real Exchange Rate Appreciation? The Missing Link Between Dutch Disease and Growth (2013, background): “Furthermore, Matsen and Torvik (2005) show the existence of some level of optimal DD.”
Absorbing a Windfall of Foreign Exchange: Dutch Disease Dynamics (2013, background): “Matsen and Torvik (2005) study the optimal trade-off between the benefits of consuming the windfall and induced loss of learning by doing.”