SeRLoc: secure range-independent localization for wireless sensor networks
By Loukas Lazos, Radha Poovendran. WISE, 2004
529 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c955901b3efaabd0b5932aef4991c5cf949fc43a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Networks and Communications
- Jean-Pierre Hubaux
- Peng Ning
- Adrian Perrig
- Donggang Liu
- Yanchao Zhang
- Yuguang Fang
- Kia Makki
- Niki Pissinou
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Jean-Pierre Hubaux
- Adrian Perrig
- Yanchao Zhang
- Yuguang Fang
- Bryan Parno
- Yun Zhou
- Biswanath Mukherjee
- Dipak Ghosal
Citations in the corpus
- Securing wireless sensor networks: a survey (2008, background): “Lazos and Poovendran [154] proposed a secure range-independent localization (SeRLoc) scheme to determine sensor locations in an untrusted environment.”
- A Routing-Driven Elliptic Curve Cryptography based Key Management Scheme for Heterogeneous Sensor Networks (2014, background): “Sensor nodes can use a secure location service such as [14] to estimate their locations, and no GPS receiver is required at each node.”
- Wireless sensor network survey (2008, methodology): “Some of the existing secure location techniques include SeRloc [60], Beacon Suite [61], DRBTS [62], SPINE [63], and ROPE [64].”
- Location-based compromise-tolerant security mechanisms for wireless sensor networks (2006, background): “All the non-anchor nodes autonomously derive their locations based on information from the anchors and neighboring nodes via secure range-free localization techniques such as [24]–[26].”
- The feasibility of launching and detecting jamming attacks in wireless networks (2005, background): “Recently, countermeasures have been proposed to protect localization services from being exploited by adversaries [5, 20, 21] In our protocol, we let every node periodically advertise its current location and further let each node keep track of both the PDR and the location of its neighbors.”
- Challenges in Securing Vehicular Networks (2005, background): “protocols that have been proposed for secure localization in sensor networks [5, 12, 13, 14, 15] to this new setting.”
- Security and Cooperation in Wireless Networks (2007, background): “Secure positioning is discussed in several papers, including [251, 88, 89].”
- Attack-resistant location estimation in sensor networks (2005, methodology): “The location verification technique proposed in [25] can ver ify the relative distance between a verifying node and a beacon node , and the technique proposed in [16] can protect location discove ry using sectored antennae at beacon nodes.”
- Sensor network security: a survey (2009, methodology): “Lazos and Poovendran in [115] propose a range overlapping method instead of using the expensive distance estimation method.”
- DoS Attacks in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Survey (2012, background): “Directional Antennas [19,20] Each pair of nodes determines the direction of received signals from neighbor; if directions match, relation is set Not applicable to network without directional antennas”