Internet skills and the digital divide

By A. V. van Deursen, J. V. van Dijk. New Media & Society, 2011

921 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Gender Studies, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8d76418165bb2aaae89e895abc7bb5b73faf9ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. A. V. van Deursen
2. J. V. van Dijk
3. Ellen J. Helsper
4. Hasnan Baber
5. Mina Fanea-ıvanovici
6. Yoo-Taek Lee
7. H. Tınmaz
8. Ruth Festl

In Gender Studies

1. J. V. van Dijk
2. A. V. van Deursen
3. Ellen J. Helsper
4. Hasnan Baber
5. Ruth Festl
6. E. Venter

In Media Technology

1. A. V. van Deursen
2. Ellen J. Helsper
3. J. V. van Dijk

Citations in the corpus

• The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access (2018, background): “Internet skills are known to vary considerable among segments of the population (e.g. Hargittai et al., 2018; Van Deursen and Van Dijk, 2011).”
• A systematic review on digital literacy (2022, background): “A set of Internet skill was suggested by Van Deursen and Van Dijk (2009, 2010b), which contains: (a) operational skills (basic skills in using internet technology), (b) formal Internet skills (navigation and orientation skills); (c) information Internet skills (fulfilling information needs), and…”
• The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online? (2015, background): “…types of skills needed to use ICTs and the types of activities people perform online (e.g., Blank & Groselj, 2014; Kalmus, 9 Realo, & Siibak, 2011; van Deursen & van Dijk, 2011, 2014; Warschauer, 2003) and how these digital divide aspects interact (e.g., Livingstone & 11 Helsper, 2007; van…”