The Third-Level Digital Divide: Who Benefits Most from Being Online?

By A. V. van Deursen, Ellen J. Helsper. 2015

688 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Media Technology, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d86191a062ac7f8410dd03497b8bac1d4c715e4a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. David Šmahel
2. Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah
3. Jia Zhou
4. Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
5. Keng Leng Siau
6. Eli Hustad
7. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou
8. Ellen J. Helsper

In Media Technology

1. Keng Leng Siau
2. Eli Hustad
3. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou
4. Ellen J. Helsper

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Pei-Luen Patrick Rau
2. Keng Leng Siau
3. Eli Hustad
4. Polyxeni Vassilakopoulou
5. Ellen J. Helsper

Citations in the corpus

• Bridging Digital Divides: a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research (2021, background): “Researchers foregrounded digital inequalities related to knowledge, economic and social resources, attributes of technology such as performance and reliability, and utility realization (DiMaggio et al. 2004; Van Dijk 2006; Van Deursen and Helsper 2015).”
• Excessive internet use by young Europeans: psychological vulnerability and digital literacy? (2020, background): “The strongest predictors of high digital literacy are occupation, education, gender, and age (Van Deursen & Helsper, 2015; Witte & Mannon, 2010).”
• Seven HCI Grand Challenges (2019, background): “Other influential factors include age, education, occupational status, health, social connectedness, and availability of infrastructures ( e.g . people in rural areas have lower levels of access to high-quality internet connections) (Van Deursen & Helsper, 2015).”