Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention.

By Colin M. Macleod, Penny A. MacDonald. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000

710 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8cb7dbee5d7d4bbc987c347a9468c2c1dc21f72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Does working memory training generalize (2010, methodology): “Congruent stimuli, on the other hand, pose no challenge to conflict resolution, and may even allow for inadvertent responding based on word information (MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000).”
What causes 3‐year‐olds' difficulty on the dimensional change card sorting task? (2002, background): “This results in a greater delay and in an increased error rate because "of a MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000).”
Behavioural Brain Research (2016, neutral): “…F (7, 133) = 21.2, p 0.001), indicating that the animals’ performance on the place discrimination task improved with training, the lesion effect and interaction show that this improvement predominantly reﬂected the scores of the Sham1 rats When the animals were tested in the dark, performance…”
Separating semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task: A functional MRI study (2005, methodology): “The Stroop task (Stroop, 1935) is among the most frequently used tasks in cognitive psychology, clinical neuropsychology, and cognitive neuroscience to study interference and attention (e.g., Kornblum et al., 1999; MacLeod, 1991; MacLeod and MacDonald, 2000; Pardo et al., 1990; Stuss et al., 2001).”
Is working memory training effective? (2012, background): “The difficulty involved in the Stroop task relates to people's tendency to direct their attention toward reading words rather than noticing the ink color in which the words are printed (MacLeod, 1991; MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000).”
Effects of an Acute Bout of Exercise on Cognitive Aspects of Stroop Performance (2006, background): “Generally, the Stroop task measures how well an individual can maintain goal-oriented processing and how well he or she can suppress or block a habitual response (MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000).”
Understanding the Consequences of Bilingualism for Language Processing and Cognition (2013, background): “…explanations for this effect, they are all grounded in models of selective attention, a component of executive processing, and within selective attention, explained in terms of simpler processes such as saliency, automaticity, and parallel processing (see for example, MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000).”
Executive Attention, Working Memory Capacity, and a Two-Factor Theory of Cognitive Control. (2003, background): “MacLeod (1998; MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000) has argued that fa cilitation in the Stroop task reflects the fact that subjects sometimes read the word on congruent trials rather than naming the color, and because word reading is faster than color naming, these undetectable reading responses reduce the…”
Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function (2007, background): “…than on congruent trials in the Stroop task, for example, has been replicated in well over 15 studies (for reviews, see Barch et al., 2001; MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000), and ACC activation has also been observed in various versions of the flanker task (Botvinick, Nystrom, Fissell, Carter, &…”
Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data (2007, background): “For example, this occurs in the case of the Stroop task (MacLeod, 1991, 1992; MacLeod & MacDonald, 2000; Stroop, 1935), the Eriksen flanker task (B. A. Eriksen & Eriksen, 1974; C. W. Eriksen & Schultz, 1979), and the Simon task (Ridderinkhof, 2002; Simon, 1969; Simon & Berbaum, 1990).”