Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities, 2nd ed.

By Aldert Vrij. 2008

405 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c8c81c9ec777bb05d4920bff38df3b3b27a57e1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Lie Detection from Multiple Cues: A Meta‐analysis (2014, methodology): “We searched the Social Sciences Citation Index for papers that cited key references, scoured relevant convention programs, examined reference lists from previous reviews (DePaulo et al., 2003; Vrij, 2008), and reviewed the references cited in every article we found.”
Nonverbal Dominance Versus Verbal Accuracy in Lie Detection (2008, methodology): “…receive a lower CBCA score than deceptive statements, but the procedure used in that study deviated in several important aspects from the procedure promoted by CBCA users, and Ruby and Brigham’s (1998) study is therefore not a fair test of the CBCA procedure (see Vrij, 2008, for details).”
Undeutsch hypothesis and Criteria Based Content Analysis: A meta-analytic review (2015, background): “Thus, the courts in countries such as Germany, Sweden, Holland, and several states in the USA admit these categorical systems as scien tific evidence (Steller & Böhm, 2006; Vrij, 2008).”
Just tell us what happened to you: autobiographical memory and seeking asylum (2012, background): “The Global Deception Team, 2006; Taylor & Hick, 2007; Vrij, 2008).”
A cognitive approach to lie detection: A meta‐analysis (2017, background): “This point of criticism does not just apply to the cognitive lie detection technique, every veracity assessment tool developed to date encounters this problem (Vrij, 2008).”
‘Look into my eyes’: can an instruction to maintain eye contact facilitate lie detection? (2010, background): “Describing events in detail is typically more cognitively challenging for liars than for truth tellers (Köhnken, 1996, 2004; Vrij, 2005, 2008).”
What Is Disinformation? (2015, background): “This is how many lie-detection techniques work (Vrij, 2008).”
Credibility Perceptions and Detection Accuracy of Fake News Headlines on Social Media: Effects of Truth-Bias and Endorsement Cues (2020, background): “Detection accuracy requires examining not only the perception of message credibility, but also whether a credibility judgment is correct relative to the “ground truth” of the message (i.e., the actual message veracity based on the best available evidence; Vrij, 2008).”
Interviewing to detect deception (2014, background): “Liars should also refrain from providing new leads (Vrij, 2008).”
Psychological vulnerabilities during police interviews. Why are they important (2010, background): “Even the influential work of Undeutsch (1982) into the first ‘verbal detection tool’ has come under recent criticism (Vrij, 2008).”
Is This Testimony Truthful, Fabricated, or Based on False Memory? (2014, methodology): “Research has demonstrated that total CBCA scores are age dependent: With increasing age, children obtain higher total CBCA scores in both truthful and fabricated accounts (see Vrij, 2008, for more detail).”
Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice (2010, unknown): “However, a robust research literature exists on human lie detection performance (see Vrij, 2008) suggesting that individuals detect deception at only slightly greater than chance levels (54% on average; see Bond & DePaulo, 2006), and that trained investigators generally perform no better than naive…”
Eliciting Reliable Information in Investigative Interviews (2014, background): “CBCA assessments are accepted as evidence in some North American courts and in criminal courts in several Western European countries (Vrij, 2008).”