Value‐driven Internet shopping: The mental accounting theory perspective

By Sumeet Gupta, Hee-Woong Kim. 2010

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c892a4ce93f955da711cb1348a5dd593ea6a157a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Factors influencing Internet shopping value and customer repurchase intention (2012, methodology): “Cus-tomers do not always buy the highest-quality product or service; other things being equal, a customer’s purchasing behavior is inﬂu-enced by his or her feelings about whether the cost and value of the offering are fair, appropriate, or deserved (Francis and White 2004, Gupta and Kim 2009).”
Antecedents of the adoption of the new mobile payment systems: The moderating effect of age (2014, background): “…the variation of its eventual results’’; Gerrard and Cunningham (2003) as ‘‘the possibility that the use of an innovation could not be safe’’; and Gupta and Kim (2010) as ‘‘a consumer’s perception about the uncertainty and the adverse consequences of a transaction performed by a seller’’.”
Impulse Buying Behaviors in Live Streaming Commerce Based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework (2021, background): “Purchase convenience means that consumers spend less time and effort in online shopping [43].”
The impact of "e-atmospherics" on physical stores (2014, background): “According to Holbrook and Hirschman (1982), retail environments operate as playful resources when they facilitate consumers' pursuit of play.”
Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust? (2012, background): “Other factors, such as convenience and pleasure, also influence repeat customers' purchase decisions (Gupta and Kim 2010).”
Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model (2017, unknown): “Also, Gerrard and Cunningham (2003) approached the same concept as ‘‘the uncertainty about what the innovation gives’’ (p. 19); and Gupta and Kim (2010) as ‘‘a customer’s perception of the uncertainty and adverse consequences of conducting transactions with a vendor’’ (p. 19).”