Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the innovation Modeling Comparison Project

By Ottmar Edenhofer, K. Lessmann, Claudia Kemfert, Michael Grubb, J. Köhler. 2006

265 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7b5df432abeda4b461efdbe4e835d371d960d90

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Feed-In Tariffs for Photovoltaics: Learning by Doing in Germany (2011, unknown): “…implementations of LBD to account for endogenous technological change in energy-environment-system models are further discussed in Löschel (2002), Grubb et al. (2002), Kypreos and Bahn (2003), Vollebergh and Kemfert (2005), Edenhofer et al. (2006), Pizer and Popp (2008), and Clarke et al. (2008).”
The IPCC AR5 guidance note on consistent treatment of uncertainties: a common approach across the working groups (2011, background): ““Ockham’s razor” proposes that if a model explains the same empirical phenomena using less specific or more plausible assumptions and parameters than another model, then it can be deemed preferable (Edenhofer et al. 2006).”
The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs (2010, methodology): “The Innovation Modeling Comparison Project (IMCP) by Edenhofer et al. (2006) focused on endogenous technological change, and the Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) (Clarke et al. , 2007) in the United States presented a comparison of three models.”
The economics of decarbonizing the energy system—results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison (2012, methodology): “Coordinated model comparison studies considered in the AR4 include the 21st Stanford Energy Modeling Forum (EMF-21, Weyant et al. 2006) and the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project (IMCP, Edenhofer et al. 2006).”
Climate change, innovation and jobs (2008, background): “They broadly indicate that, over time, climate policy induces additional technological change (Edenhofer et al., 2006).”
Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context (2007, methodology): “Several model comparison projects contributed to the new literature, including the Energy Modelling Forum’s EMF-19 (Weyant, 2004) and EMF-21 studies (De la Chesnaye and Weyant, 2006), that focused on technology change and multi-gas studies, respectively, the IMCP (International Model Comparison Proj”
Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies (2009, background): “While there is wide variation in the observed rates of ‘‘learning’’, studies do provide evidence that costs, almost always, decline as cumulative production increases (Wright, 1936; Alchian, 1963; Rapping, 1965; Dutton and Thomas, 1984 ).”
To link or not to link: benefits and disadvantages of linking cap-and-trade systems (2009, background): “Inducing technological change: Only a stable and sufficiently high price of carbon is expected to induce (via R&D) the technological change that is essential for making climate stabilization economically feasible (Edenhofer et al., 2006).”
The Stern Review of the Economics of Climate Change: A Comment (2006, unknown): “Its estimates of the costs of emission reduction are largely inspired by the Innovation Modeling Comparison Project (Edenhofer et al., 2006; Grubb et al., 2006; Koehler et al., 2006), a group of models that make overly optimistic assumptions on technological progress and the costs of emission…”