To link or not to link: benefits and disadvantages of linking cap-and-trade systems
By C. Flachsland, Robert Marschinski, Ottmar Edenhofer. 2009
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28e0644d8b71b1e2e8130bf28e503d71656ad483
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Environmental Engineering
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Credible commitment in carbon policy (2012, background): “Note that linking regional emissions trading systems could provide an alternative source of external commitment because linking agreements can curtail the flexibility for unilateral adjustments to carbon pricing (Flachsland et al., 2009).”
- Connect the dots: managing the fragmentation of global climate governance (2013, unknown): “It is possible to conceive of various levels of integration of trading systems, ranging from entirely separate carbon markets up to fully integrated global emissions trading (Flachsland et al. 2009a).”
- Linking carbon markets: concepts, case studies and pathways (2009, background): “Since the Kyoto Protocol is underpinned by robust MRV requirements, concerns regarding MRV are unlikely to inhibit the trade of emissions permits between schemes whose trading units are backed by the Protocol or some comparable follow-up agreement.”