The relationship between qualitative and quantitative research: paradigm loyalty versus methodological eclecticism

466 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The use of visual methods with children in a mixed methods study of family food practices (2013, unknown): “Brannen (2005) suggests that corroboration (in the sense of triangulation) is only one of at least four possibilities (Bryman, 2001; Hammersley, 1996; Rossman & Wilson, 1994).”
Mentoring beginning teachers: What we know and what we don't (2009, background): “…inclusion and exclusion criteria – we were primarily interested in empirical studies, whether ‘qualitative’, ‘quantitative’ or mixed methods studies (Hammersley, 1996; Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998), yet we did not rule out other literature reviews, if only for their potential value in leading…”
Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms (2021, background): “Hammersley (1996), for example, states that qualitative and quantitative research paradigms are “founded on incommensurable philosophical and/or political presuppositions'' (p. 2).”
Mechanisms Of Change In Cognitive Therapy: The Case Of Automatic Thought Records And Behavioural Experiments (2003, background): “…not easily identified using purely quantitative approaches (Bennett-Levy & Taylor, 2000; Patton, 1990), and, increasingly, writers are recognizing that quantitative and qualitative methodologies can be complementary (Brannen, 1992; Hammersley, 1996; Miles & Huberman, 1994; Patton, 1990).”