The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models
By Erik D. Reichle, Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2003
1,091 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c771ed2164253ebea25b1ef4c4a2870683090a3b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Keith Rayner
- Ralph R. Radach
- Elizabeth R. Schotter
- Bernhard Angele
- Reinhold Kliegl
- Antje Nuthmann
- Ronan G. Reilly
- Derek M. Jones
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Keith Rayner
- Elizabeth R. Schotter
- Ralph R. Radach
- Bernhard Angele
- Derek M. Jones
- Adrian Staub
- Reinhold Kliegl
- Alexander Pollatsek
In Human-Computer Interaction
- Keith Rayner
- Ralph R. Radach
- Ronan G. Reilly
- Derek M. Jones
- Antje Nuthmann
- Reinhold Kliegl
- Ralf Engbert
- Alexander Pollatsek
Citations in the corpus
- Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading (2006, background): “The saliency units accumulate activity over time and reach a peak of activation after 50 time steps, corresponding roughly to the eye-brain trans- mission lag (McConkie, 1983; Sereno et al., 1998; Reichle et al., 2003).”
- E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading (2006, methodology): “Z Reader 7 (Reichle et al., 2003), RMSD = .088; and E–”
- The New C Standard (Excerpted material) An Economic and Cultural Commentary (2008, positive): “The following discussion is based on papers by Rayner[33] and Reichle, Rayner, and Pollatsek.[35] During reading, a person’s eyes make short rapid movements.”
- Developmental dyslexia: the visual attention span deficit hypothesis. (2007, background): “Although models of eye movement control in reading ( Reichle, Rayner, & Pollatsek, 2003 ) and some models of word recognition (Behrmann, Moscovitch, & Mozer, 1991; Laberge & Samuels, 1974; Laberge & Brown, 1989) emphasise the role of visual attention, most reading theories do not specify the attenti”
- SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. (2005, methodology): “Previous theoretical models were based on a multiplicative interaction of word frequency and predictability (Engbert & Kliegl, 2001, 2003b; Engbert et al., 2002, 2004; Reichle et al., 1998, 1999, 2003).”
- Eye movements when reading spaced and unspaced Thai and English : a comparison of Thai–English bilinguals and English monolinguals (2009, positive): “Research into the architecture and dynamics of information processing during reading has entered a new stage with the recent development of complex theories and computational models (see Engbert, Nuthmann, Richter, & Kliegl, 2005; Reichle, Rayner, & Pollatsek, 2003, for seminal discussions).”
- Parafoveal processing in reading (2011, methodology): “For a comparison of many of these models, see Reichle, Rayner, and Pollatsek (2003). stage, M2, follows M1 and triggers the saccade when it finishes and is a nonlabile stage; it cannot be canceled.”
- Neural Speed Reading via Skim-RNN (2017, background): “Modeling human’s attention while reading has been studied in the field of cognitive psychology (Reichle et al., 2003).”