Enhancing Survey Response Rates at the Executive Level: Are Employee- or Consumer-Level Techniques Effective?:

By Cynthia S. Cycyota, David A. Harrison. 2002

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c75a32fae7cbbbfc4ebb8e0746dea403caefe125

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Marjan Gorgievski
2. Dominika Wach
3. Ute Stephan
4. James P. Spillane
5. O. Fatoki
6. J. Moriano

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ute Stephan
2. Marjan Gorgievski
3. James P. Spillane
4. Dominika Wach

Citations in the corpus

• In Pursuit of Greatness: CEO Narcissism, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Firm Performance Variance (2013, unknown): “Low response rates (10-15%) are typical for mailed surveys to top executives, particularly when asking sensitive questions, and are comparable to other similar studies (Cycyota and Harrison, 2002; Ling et al., 2008).”
• More than money: Developing an integrative multi-factorial measure of entrepreneurial success (2016, result): “We also encountered a low response rate which is a typical challenge in studies of entrepreneurs and senior managers (Cycyota and Harrison, 2002).”
• Assessing the Utility of a Daily Log for Measuring Principal Leadership Practice (2010, background): “Cycyota and Harrison (2002, 2006) found that many follow-up strategies that have proven to be effective at boosting response rates with samples taken from the general population were ineffective with samples of executives.”