Corporate Law’s Limits

By Mark J. Roe. The Journal of Legal Studies, 2002

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c723d541719df3239030049571c33560ecc964ba

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

What Connects Industrial Relations and Corporate Governance? Explaining Institutional Complementarity (2005, background): “If competition is high, such incentives are low as rent-seeking would reduce the survival probability of the firm (Roe 2002: 44; see also Allen and Gale 1999).”
Corporate Governance and the Home Bias (2003, background): “First, as Roe (2002) points out, ownership is concentrated in a number of countries with good corporate law.”
Public and Private Enforcement of Securities Laws: Resource-Based Evidence (2009, unknown): “See, e.g., Jensen (1986, 1989), Gilson (2006), Roe (2002).8 In Table 8, we regress these three variables associated with dispersed ownership on our two key measures of public enforcement and several other legal indices and controls.”
Corporate Governance Convergence : Evidence from Takeover Regulation Reforms in Europe (2005, background): “Roe (2002) proposes an alternative scenario.”
Ownership: Evolution and Regulation (2009, unknown): “Thus our evidence indicates that, to the extent that investor protection was strengthened during the 20th century, it was primarily by statute rather than through the application of common law in the courts, consistent with the arguments in Roe (2002).”
Comparative and International Corporate Governance (2010, background): “Without referring to Hofstede or similar schemes, other legal scholars have also taken up the question of examining how culture may shape and interact the boundaries of corporate law, for example by influencing the propensity and form of related party transactions (Roe, 2002a).”
Corporate hedging and speculation with derivatives (2017, background): “15 Note, however, that ownership concentration is also high in number of countries with good corporate law (Roe, 2002).”
Explaining diversity in the worldwide diffusion of codes of good governance (2010, background): “justify their choice to the other constituents (Schwartz, 1999). Following from Schwartz’s (1999) argument that role incumbents draw on shared cultural values to enforce preferred behavior, it can be expected that the antecedents of alternative types of institutional pressure will be associated with”
Varieties of Institutional Investors and National Models of Capitalism: The Transformation of Corporate Governance in France and Germany (2006, background): “This reflects the fact that corporate law in the two countries provides an adequately acceptable level of financial transparency, a sufficient level of protection for minority shareholders, and that the quality of law enforcement is excellent.(36) Mutual and hedge funds, on the other hand, have prim”
State Capacity, Minority Shareholder Protections, and Stock Market Development (2016, background): “…shareholder rights, including formal laws and regulations, codes of good corporate governance, taken-for-granted assumptions about the appropriate role of the various stakeholders, and other informal norms of behavior sanctioned by tradition or practice (Roe, 2002; Aguilera and Jackson, 2003).”
A Law and Finance Analysis of Initial Public Offerings (2004, unknown): “ffermost ecision ership e IPO eJournal of Financial Intermediation 13 (2004) 324–358”