Trust and relationship commitment in the United Kingdom voluntary sector: Determinants of donor behavior

By A. Sargeant, Stephen Lee. 2004

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6d51eb8ac2f697ff99ef9e6bb9bfa1a292f3353

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Lucy Woodliffe
2. S. van der Linden
3. Pamala Wiepking
4. René Bekkers
5. A. Sargeant

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Pamala Wiepking
2. René Bekkers
3. Lucy Woodliffe
4. S. van der Linden
5. T. James
6. Hanna Zagefka
7. A. Sargeant
8. J. Roozenbeek

In Strategy and Management

1. Lucy Woodliffe
2. René Bekkers
3. S. van der Linden
4. A. Sargeant
5. Pamala Wiepking

Citations in the corpus

• Charitable Intent: A Moral or Social Construct? A Revised Theory of Planned Behavior Model (2011, background): “2005), as well as the role of trust and commitment (Sargeant and Lee 2004) and the role of social relations (Radley and Kennedy 1995).”
• A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010, background): “Survey studies by Sargeant and colleagues reveal that the relationship of confidence with giving is mediated by relationship commitment (Sargeant et al., 2006; Sargeant & Lee, 2004).”
• Building Donor Loyalty: The Antecedents and Role of Commitment in the Context of Charity Giving (2007, methodology): “Recent thinking in respect of customer loyalty suggests that a wider variety of context specific factors might drive loyalty (Reichheld 2000) and that the construct “commitment” might also have a significant role to play (Morgan and Hunt 1994; Sargeant and Lee 2004).”
• Gift giving: An interdisciplinary review (2007, background): “Indeed, these relationships were tested empirically by Sargeant and Lee (2004) who were able to explain 20% of the variation in giving by reference to their model.”
• The Psychology of Charitable Donations to Disaster Victims and Beyond (2015, background): “For example, the perceived trustworthiness of a charitable organization, organizational accountability, and organizational commitment have all been found to inform willingness to support an organization (Polonsky, Shelley, & Voola, 2002; Sargeant & Lee, 2004).”
• Donating to disaster victims: Responses to natural and humanly caused events (2011, unknown): “For example, Sargeant and Lee (2004) analysed perceptions of individual charities, explaining why people donate to one organisation rather than another.”