How to do a meta-analysis.

By Andy Field, Raphael Gillett. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 2010

1,097 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6c5f809180c6789aa95a26f6814c79b62dfe3d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Effectiveness of career choice interventions: A meta-analytic replication and extension (2017, methodology): “Whereas fixed-effect models were more common in the past, random-effects models are increasingly popular due to the generalizations that can be made from random-effects results (Fields & Gillett, 2010; Hedges, 2009).”
Transformational Instructor-Leadership in Higher Education Teaching: A Meta-Analytic Review and Research Agenda (2016, methodology): “The analyses were conducted using Microsoft Excel, and then the calculated values were verified using SPSS syntax provided by Field and Gillett (2010).”
Zinc-enriched fertilisers as a potential public health intervention in Africa (2015, background): “The majority of studies did not report variance of Zn or PA concentration in the grain so it was not possible to perform a standard metaanalysis in which variance is used to weight the contribution of effect size (Field and Gillett 2010).”
The motivation and inhibition of breaking the rules: : Personal values structures predict unethicality (2015, methodology): “The use of language to tap into people’s psyche dates back to Freud (1901) who analyzed patients’ slips of the tongue and Lacan and Wilden (1968) who argued that the unconscious manifests itself in language use.”
Materialistic cues make us miserable: A meta‐analysis of the experimental evidence for the effects of materialism on individual and societal well‐being (2020, methodology): “We used random effect models, because data collected in social science is likely to have variable population parameters (Field & Gillett, 2010).”
Effects of attributed responsibility and response strategies on organizational reputation: A meta-analysis of situational crisis communication theory research (2016, methodology): “A chi-square test of homogeneity was used to examine the mean weighted correlations (Field & Gillett, 2010).”
The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta-analysis (2016, methodology): “Finally, SPSS was used to analyse relationships between potential moderator variables and each of the effect sizes separately (Cooper, 2010; Plonsky & Oswald, 2012).”
Burnout and Its Relations with Basic Psychological Needs and Motivation among Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta#Analysis (2013, methodology): “There are two popular estimating methods for meta-analysis (Field & Gillett, 2010), namely, methods by Hunter and Schmidt (2004) and Hedges and Olkin (1985).”
STUDY QUALITY IN SLA (2013, result): “…problematic because of their debilitating effect on statistical power (Chaudron, 1986 ; Crookes, 1991 ; Flahive & EhlersZavala, 2010; Hauser, 2001; Henning, 1986 ; Larson-Hall, 2010 ; Lazaraton, 1991 ; Norris & Ortega, 2006 ; Oswald & Plonsky, 2010 ; Plonsky & Gass, 2011 ; Plonsky & Oswald, 2012 ).”