Microstructural Control of Additively Manufactured Metallic Materials

By P. Collins, D. A. Brice, P. Samimi, I. Ghamarian, H. Fraser. 2016

428 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6b9914cf767c5511ad7f749ccbe8e07561836b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Automotive Engineering

1. T. DebRoy
2. T. Mukherjee
3. H. Wei
4. Amitava De
5. Huijun Li
6. Zengxi Pan
7. Wei Zhang
8. Dominic Cuiuri

In Mechanical Engineering

1. T. DebRoy
2. T. Mukherjee
3. H. Wei
4. Amitava De
5. Wei Zhang
6. Huijun Li
7. Zengxi Pan
8. J. Elmer

Citations in the corpus

• A comparison of fatigue strength sensitivity to defects for materials manufactured by AM or traditional processes (2017, background): “, columnar grains for AlSi10Mg or basket-weave and Widmanstätten for Ti6Al4V) can have an important effect on the nucleation and short crack propagation phases [96].”
• Grain Structure Control of Additively Manufactured Metallic Materials (2017, background): “For a constant temperature gradient, a greater constitutional supercooling inclines to promote equiaxed solidification, which requires a higher freezing range of the alloy [1].”
• The effects of forced interpass cooling on the material properties of wire arc additively manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy (2018, background): “3 history that involves alternate re-heating and re-cooling cycles (Collins et al., 2016).”
• Additive manufacturing of high-strength crack-free Ni-based Hastelloy X superalloy (2019, background): “Therefore, this type of posttreatment hence does not represent an ideal alternative in order to mitigate hot cracking defects and limit their effect on the mechanical behaviour of nickel-based superalloys [22][23][24].”