Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture

By Pete Smith, Daniel L. Martino, Z. Cai, D. Gwary, H. Janzen, Pushpam Kumar, Bruce A. McCarl, S. Ogle, F. O'Mara, C. Rice and 8 more. 2007

672 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6adc0ba2f6e93faba85f81f736b8b67112d4b46

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. K. McNamara
2. Vera Eory
3. Pete Smith
4. Ralph C. Martin
5. J. Aryal
6. D. Lynch
7. M. L. Jat
8. A. Chandra

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Felix Creutzig
2. W. Lamb
3. J. Minx
4. Pete Smith
5. Sabine Fuss
6. M. Callaghan
7. Jérôme Hilaire
8. Jens Hartmann

In Environmental Engineering

1. Felix Creutzig
2. Gregory F. Nemet
3. Mark Lubell
4. Pete Smith
5. A. McVittie
6. Ralph C. Martin
7. D. Lynch
8. W. Lamb

Citations in the corpus

• ON-FARM ECONOMIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF ZERO-TILLAGE WHEAT: A CASE OF NORTH-WEST INDIA (2014, background): “Among the options for mitigating GHG within agricultural system, soil carbon sequestration offers, by far, the highest potential, nearly 89% of the total technical potential worldwide (Smith et al., 2007).”
• A regional comparison of the effects of climate change on agricultural crops in Europe (2012, background): “However, evaluating the constraints to policy implementation is difficult (Smith et al. 2007; Urwin and Jordan 2008).”
• Livestock biodiversity and sustainability (2011, background): “Improved grazingmanagement has positive environmental effects (soil C sequestration and biodiversity) and a favorable impact on livestock productivity (Smith et al., 2007).”
• Climate-smart agriculture: perspectives and framings (2018, background): “Furthermore, the IPCC assessment reports provide a discussion on important overlaps and non-linear interactions between food, water, land, and climate systems (Klein et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2007).”
• Agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation potential globally, in Europe and in the UK: what have we learnt in the last 20 years? (2012, methodology): “These potentials represent mitigation of 5–90% of all other agricultural mitigation measures combined (Smith et al., 2007a, 2008).”
• Perceptions and responses to climate policy risks among California farmers (2013, background): “, 2007; Smit and Skinner, 2002) and mitigation (Smith et al., 2007).”
• The natural fix? The role of ecosystems in climate mitigation: a UNEP rapid response assessment. (2009, background): “%) can be realised in developing countries (Smith et al. 2007b).”
• Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for UK Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions (2011, methodology): “MACCs for agriculture have used qualitative judgment ECCP (2001) and Weiske (2005, 2006), and more empirical methods (McCarl and Schneider, 2001, 2003; US-EPA, 2005, 2006; Weiske and Michael, 2007; Smith et al. 2007a,b, 2008; Perez et al., 2003; De Cara et al. 2005; Deybe and Fallot, 2003).”
• The Carbon and Global Warming Potential Impacts of Organic Farming: Does It Have a Significant Role in an Energy Constrained World? (2011, background): “There are also significant debates about how to account for regional variability, measurement uncertainties, process uncertainties, identifying real additionality, reducing leakages, and appropriate pricing of stored carbon [112].”