Openness, knowledge, innovation and growth in UK business services

By J. Love, S. Roper, John R. Bryson. 2011

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c6889db947a44f964e93bb1336a017c971d80f50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Firms’ knowledge search and local knowledge externalities in innovation performance (2017, background): “Design spending has also been linked to innovative outputs and we therefore include a dummy variable which takes value 1 where a firm was investing in design (Love et al., 2011).”
Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation (2017, methodology): “While previous research has focused on the outcomes of open search (e.g., Lee et al., 2010; Love et al., 2011; West et al., 2014), this research has not yet extended to the particular case of crowdfunding – despite an acknowledged need to better understand the effects of open innovation on startups…”
Innovation, quality management and learning: Short-term and longer-term effects (2017, background): “In addition, we find that government support for innovation strongly and significantly impacts on innovation performance (Love et al., 2011).”
How does social software change knowledge management? Toward a strategic research agenda (2012, background): “During the last decade the ‘‘protective take’’ on knowledge in the knowledge-based view of the firm has been supplemented with a call for more openness, in particular about content relevant to innovation (see Chesbrough, 2003; Laursen and Salter, 2006; Love et al., 2011).”
Make-or-buy configurational approaches in product-service ecosystems and performance (2019, background): “This article also helps to explain the crucial role of KIBS in servitization business ecosystems (Kohtamäki & Partanen, 2016; Lafuente et al., 2017; Love et al., 2011).”
Inbound open innovation and firm performance (2020, unknown): “, 2016), firm growth (Love et al., 2011), innovativeness/innovation performance (Chen, Chen, & Vanhaverbeke, 2011; Egbetokun, 2015; Spithoven, Frantzen, & Clarysse, 2010) and product/NPD performance (Gesing, Antons, Piening, Rese, & Salge, 2015; Praest Knudsen & Bøtker Mortensen, 2011).”
SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review of existing evidence (2015, background): “Evidence from innovation surveys also suggests a positive linkage between design investment and innovation outputs in a range of contexts (Cereda et al., 2005; Love et al., 2011).”
Experience in R&D collaborations, innovative performance and the moderating effect of different dimensions of absorptive capacity (2020, unknown): “Given the importance of R&D collaborations, previous studies have provided valuable insights into what enables firms to collaborate with different types of partners and examined how partners affect a firm’s innovative output (Tether, 2002; Roper et al., 2008; Love et al., 2011; Ganotakis and Love 20”