Reconceptualizing Emotion Regulation

229 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Maturing Field of Emotion Regulation (2011, background): “In contrast, disciplines that highlight social interactions (e.g., developmental psychology; Campos et al., 2011; sociology; Barbalet, 2011) typically construe emotion regulation as a relational process.”
The Interpersonal Functions of Empathy: A Relational Perspective (2017, background): “Such personally relevant contexts are, more often than not, interpersonal in nature, resulting in the emotions of one person influencing those of another in a dynamic, bidirectional fashion (Butler, 2015; Campos et al., 2011; Reeck et al., 2016; Zaki & Williams, 2013).”
Emotion in sport: considering interpersonal regulation strategies (2013, background): “Furthermore, by incorporating theory from other applications of psychology into naturalistic research studies, sport researchers have the opportunity to address the concern of poor ecological validity which has been raised in emotion regulation research in psychology (Campos et al., 2011).”
Interpersonal Emotion Regulation in the Workplace: A Conceptual and Operational Review and Future Research Agenda (2018, unknown): “Another, less common, approach to interpersonal ER (as depicted in Table 1) is to consider how intrinsic and extrinsic ER processes might co-occur within a relationship (e.g. Campos et al. 2011; Rimé 2007, 2009; Zaki and Williams 2013), a truly interpersonal-level approach.”