A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli
By Meredith Minear, Denise C. Park. Behavoir research methods, instruments & computers, 2004
1,280 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c64e51ab702ecdfc65281eb06fae8722809a0756
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Hava T. Siegelmann
- Christopher Summerfield
- Tomoyasu Horikawa
- Dimitri Nowicki
- Yoichi Miyawaki
- Tobias Egner
- Yukiyasu Kamitani
- Debra Lieberman
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Xiaoming Liu
- Hu Han
- Anil K. Jain
- Yukiyasu Kamitani
- Tomoyasu Horikawa
- Michael C. Mozer
- William J. Huggins
- Charles Otto
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- M. van Vugt
- L. DeBruine
- B. Jones
- Allen Grabo
- Brian R. Spisak
- Virgil Zeigler‐Hill
- Joshua M. Tybur
- Debra Lieberman
Citations in the corpus
- Neural Decoding of Visual Imagery During Sleep (2013, background): “edu) (41); object images from The Object Databank (http://stims.”
- Demographic Estimation from Face Images: Human vs. Machine Performance (2015, background): “There has been a growing interest in automatic extraction of demographic information from face images or videos, due to many emerging applications [2], [5], [6].”
- The independent effects of skin tone and facial features on Whites' affective reactions to Blacks (2012, methodology): “In Step 1, we created a pool of 120 pictures of Black men with neutral facial expressions, collected from university athletic websites and the Productive Aging Lab Face Database (Minear & Park, 2004).”
- ChaLearn Looking at People and Faces of the World: Face AnalysisWorkshop and Challenge 2016 (2016, neutral): “PAL [31] 580 580 19 - 93 Age group No No -”
- Disgust facilitates outgroup dehumanization (2013, methodology): “A total of 12 color photographs (six ingroup, six outgroup) were selected from the Productive Aging Lab Face Database (Minear & Park, 2004), each depicting the frontal facial view of a Caucasian adult, aged 18–29, with equal gender representation.”
- Optimizing Instructional Policies (2013, background): “The faces were balanced across ethnicity, age, and gender (provided by Minear & Park, 2004).”
- The Dark Triad and sexual harassment proclivity (2016, background): “Participants were also asked to view a series of color head and shoulder full-face photographs from the Productive Aging Laboratory (Minear & Park, 2004).”
- Facing the situation: Testing a biosocial contingency model of leadership in intergroup relations using masculine and feminine faces (2012, methodology): “Faces of leader candidates (all males) were taken from a neutral expressions faces database maintained by the Center for Vital Longevity (Minear & Park, 2004).”
- Loving-kindness meditation increases social connectedness. (2008, methodology): “2 Photographs of faces were obtained from an online face database developed by Minear and Park (2004). 721 BRIEF REPORTS”
- Natural ambiguities: Racial categorization of multiracial individuals (2012, methodology): “The monoracial faces, Black and White, were collected by Minear and Park (2004) and used by Peery and Bodenhausen (2008).”
- Expectation and Surprise Determine Neural Population Responses in the Ventral Visual Stream (2010, methodology): “Face Database (Minear and Park, 2004); the Cohn–Kanade Facial Ex-”
- A Superhumanization Bias in Whites’ Perceptions of Blacks (2015, methodology): “Participants were randomly assigned to one of two versions of the study that were identical except for the photographs of the two targets used (one pair taken from the Minear & Park, 2004, database and one taken from the IAT in Study 1; both were matched on expression).”
- Precision functional mapping of individual human brains (2017, neutral): “Face stimuli were taken from several publicly available databases: The Psychological Image Collection at Stirling’s 2D face set (http://pics.psych.stir.ac.uk/); the CNBC Tarrlab ‘‘Face Place’’ repository (wiki.cnbc.cmu.edu/Face_Place; Righi et al., 2012); the Park Aging Mind Laboratory Face Database”
- The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data (2015, neutral): “Like KDEF, some other databases use actors (e.g., Tottenham et al., 2009), but the majority employ lay volunteers (e.g., Belhumeur, Hespanha, & Kriegman, 1997; Minear & Park, 2004; Rhodes, Proffitt, Grady, & Sumich, 1998; Thomaz & Giraldi, 2010).”
- Flexible Kernel Memory (2010, methodology): “The faces were obtained from the Productive Aging Lab Face Database [53] and other volunteers (All the face images used in our research were taken from the Productive Aging Lab’s Face In our simulations we created a network with 16 attractors representing 16 different faces; it had 76800 input and…”