Gynoecium Structure and Evolution in Basal Angiosperms

By P. K. Endress, A. Igersheim. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PLANT SCIENCES, 2000

278 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c63ee98f86c9fe627ff32f0f10d59939057a81f2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Comparative floral morphology and anatomy of Anacardiaceae and Burseraceae (Sapindales), with a special focus on gynoecium structure and evolution (2009, background): “In both families, carpels are of angiospermy type 4 (for term, see Endress & Igersheim, 2000).”
Towards a phylogenetic nomenclature of Tracheophyta (2007, background): “One possibility is that plicate carpels sealed by postgenital fusion of the margins (see Endress & Igersheim, 2000) evolved at this point, but this depends on the ultimate placement of Chloranthaceae, which have ascidiate carpels sealed by secretion, comparable to those of Amborella and other…”
Comparative floral structure and systematics in Celastrales (Celastraceae, Parnassiaceae, Lepidobotryaceae) (2005, background): “Angiospermy is of type 4 (as defined by Endress & Igersheim, 2000) in all taxa of this study, with the exception of the sterile gynoecium in the male flower of Lepidobotrys, which was of angiospermy type 2.”
Evolution of Microsporogenesis in Angiosperms (2002, background): “…manuscript received September 2001. ing about relationships among early-branching angiosperms and prompted a series of seminal papers evaluating character evolution in these taxa, especially with regard to reproductive characters (Endress and Igersheim 2000; Floyd and Friedman 2000; Sampson 2000a).”
Reconstructing the basal angiosperm phylogeny: evaluating information content of mitochondrial genes (2006, unknown): “…increased significantly over the last two decades (Upchurch, 1984; Walker & Walker, 1984; Endress & Hufford, 1989; Friis & al., 1994, 1999, 2000; Endress & Igersheim, 2000; Floyd & Friedman, 2000; Mohr & Friis, 2000; Sampson, 2000; Thien & al., 2000, von Balthazar & al., 2005), comprehensive…”
Evolutionary History of the Monocot Flower1 (2010, background): “Postgenital fusion does occur during gynoecium development of Nymphaeaceae and Aristolochiaceae, but it is restricted to the sealing of individual carpels (e.g., Endress & Igersheim, 2000) and does not contribute to fusion between carpels.”
Angiosperm Floral Evolution: Morphological Developmental Framework (2006, background): “of angiosperms, for example, on the petals of asterids (Erbar, 1991; Erbar and Leins, 1996), the androecium of basal angiosperms (Endress and HuVord, 1989), the gynoecium through all basal angiosperm families (Endress and Igersheim, 2000a), and the flowers of legumes (Tucker, 1992,”
Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis of Basal Angiosperms: Comparison and Combination with Molecular Data (2000, background): “Degeneria: Bailey and Smith (1942); Myristicaceae: Vander Wyk and Canright (1956); Winteraceae: separate strands in Tasmannia, Drimys assumed to be ancestral; Amborella: cylinder composed entirely of U-shaped sclereids (Money et al. 1950) scored either 1 or 2; Chloranthaceae: Swamy (1953); Idiosperm”
Phylogeny and evolutionary patterns in Nymphaeales: integrating genes, genomes and morphology (2008, background): “Carpel form is ascidiate in Nymphaeaceae except in Barclaya, where carpels appear plicate due to expansion of the floral center (Endress & Igersheim, 2000a), and also in Cabombaceae (Endress, 2005).”
The Reproductive Structures of the Basal Angiosperm Amborella Trichopoda (Amborellaceae) (2000, background): “Each carpel is strongly ascidiate and has a single ventral-median ovule (Endress 1994; Endress and Igersheim 1997, 2000) (fig.”
Evolution of Endosperm Developmental Patterns among Basal Flowering Plants (2000, background): “1994; Williamson and Schneider 1994; Friis 1996; Tucker and Douglas 1996; Endress and Igersheim 1997, 2000a, 2000b; Igersheim and Endress 1997, 1998; von Balthazar and Endress 1999; Hayes et al. 2000), pollen structure (Sampson and Endress 1984; Foreman and Sampson 1987; Sampson 1987, 1993, 1995,…”
Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes (2010, background): “…non-molecular characters have been surveyed critically across all major groups, as has been done for basal angiosperms (Doyle & Endress, 2000, 2010; Endress & Igersheim, 2000; Endress & Doyle, 2009), basal eudicots (Endress & Igersheim, 1999), monocots (Prychid et al., 2004; Rudall & Bateman,…”
Morphological Phylogenetic Analysis of Living and Fossil Chloranthaceae (2004, methodology): “Characters 79, 80, and 82–85 were observed by Endress and Igersheim (1997) in A. lucida, A. rubricaulis, C. spicatus, H. mexicanum, and S. chloranthoides.”
Flower Evolution: The Origin and Subsequent Diversification of the Angiosperm Flower (2009, background): “…that separates angiosperms from their gymnosperm relatives, although fully closed (that is, fused) carpels are neither found in Amborella nor in several other early diverging angiosperm lineages (for example Trimenia, Austrobaileya, Chloranthaceae) (Endress 2001a; Endress & Igersheim 2000a, 2000b).”
Seed ferns and the origin of angiosperms (2006, methodology): “Asaroideae (1) based on Doyle and Endress (2000) and Dickison (1992) rather than (0) for Aristolochiaceae in Doyle (1996); Winteraceae (?) based on Doyle and Endress (2000) rather than (0) in Doyle (1996), to allow homology of the annulus with sculpture in other taxa.”